| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Rubbish?.Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R
What a load of rubbish, I don't think he is bothered at all by the name calling, if someone calls you something instead of responding to what you have said then you are going to mention it aren't you?
He is always Quick enough to point out He has been called a Name.
The delusion is strong in this thread.
Ask any black man if he'd prefer to be called a ****** or kicked in the nuts by a professional footballer.
if this is a serious question then option 2 without a doubt.
Thx
Colonel thoroughly zapped the opposition, tied them up in knots, made them look like numb-nutted morons and instead of folding they continue to justify violence in response to a word.
He's after an argument.
Soon as I say I can let things lie in a separate thread he can't respond to that as I'm being decent and there's no angle for him to argue from, so he's not interested. Says it all.
I'm looking for an argument by not responding to you?
I tell you what mate, you've got the absolute knack for dragging me back to talk to you, you're either as daft as you seem or a secret genius.
This really is the last response to you in here now, bon voyage idiot-savant!
Indeed"mob mentality"
rejecting an english manager to manage the Welsh National team not a problem
rejecting Craig Bellamy because you don't like him - not a problem
rejecting Nathan Blake because he is black - huge problem
Ron Atkinson was only having a laugh when he said that french player was a typical lazy nggr
If you went down the bay , wether you were a bloke or a woman and called a black guy a nggr then if you got a slap then I am afraid that's possibly going to be the conclusionI'm not a feminist, I want equality not extra rights for women like those nutters.
I'm not really talking about the game, Sludge said that if CC were to go down the bay tonight and make a racist comment he would deserve a kicking, I'm asking if the same would apply to me? I'm pretty sure he would say there is no excuse to hit a woman so to me that would be VIOLENCE WHEN IT SUITS, it's as simple as that.
I mean are people really this fecking stupid or just argueing for the sake of it ?
I think it's the latter
Yeah, everyone knows that already Sludge, you're completely missing the point of the thread.
Is it acceptable conclusion in your eyes?
I think we're approaching the days of true equality where racists of all gender ( fluid or otherwise ) are on the end of a firm boot to the bollocks / uterus on the football pitch.
I don't have a problem with women being treated the same as men, there have been many occasions where I have seen drunken women hitting men with their shoes who thoroughly deserve a punch in the face, I'm simply trying to establish what's acceptable in some peoples eyes.
Not having read all the thread but it seems vigilante justice is the way forward for some, totally ignoring the rule of law.
Not a hard concept to grasp is it, you respond if there's an argument, you ignore anything you can't come up with a smart response to.I'm looking for an argument by not responding to you?
I tell you what mate, you've got the absolute knack for dragging me back to talk to you, you're either as daft as you seem or a secret genius.
This really is the last response to you in here now, bon voyage idiot-savant!
You're the single most argumentative person in the board history. Your rap sheet is huge..
And stop contradicting yourself by complaining about insults and then insulting me in your own posts. Cry baby.
There's another victim like you on here, funnily enough the ONLY other poster I clash with (don't reply Nick I'm simply using you as an example to the resident troll here)
An assumption like this from someone only been on here for 'a Strawberry Season'?
My Nan always used to say to me, 'Violence is NEVER the answer'.
Recently, when on the TV Game Show 'The Weakest Link' Anne Robinson asked me the question : What V can be behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something? and I answered the question incorrectly and missed out banking £1000.
Well, thanks a f*cking lot Nan.
No it’s not mob mentality, it seems to me to be a number of people with a common viewpoint and or or two with a different viewpoint.
If I disagree with the colonel (who I have a lot of time for btw) should I keep schtum I case I get accused of being part of some mob?
What’s your opinion on the subject of the debate btw?
As I said, maybe, maybe not mob mentality but it is certainly no coincidence that the same three or four posters get involved in the majority of the spats on here.
My view? If any of those tackles were considered to be assaults then I'm sure the referee would have dealt with them as such and sent the perpetrators off. Not sure any were sent off were they?
Not like I stumbled upon the site. Like a lot of Cardiff fans I've read here and other boards for years..An assumption like this from someone only been on here for 'a Strawberry Season'?
Seem to remember your blooper being linked on ****. Pages long it was.
First your wife, now you in to stick up for your mate. Talk about mob mentality.
I didn't stick up for anybody due to fear of reprisals. ie someone saying 'You're just sticking up for your mate.'
For your information I have never met the Colonel.
Thanks.
If you had read the whole thread, it’s about a few hard challenges in a football match, not Charles Bronson in death wish.
looking at the video, those were not just hard challenges but designed to injure a person,
With the exception of the last, the others are similar challenges to those you see in a lot of niggly games.
Racist gets hard tackles. Eh... whatever.
Some of us also appear on football related threads at the same time.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
