+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 29

Thread: FAO "Nick"

  1. #1

    FAO "Nick"

    I see another thread of yours disappeared, you must be saying the wrong things

  2. #2

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I see another thread of yours disappeared, you must be saying the wrong things
    It's a real mystery isn't it.

  3. #3

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    It's a real mystery isn't it.

  4. #4
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    29,223
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I see another thread of yours disappeared, you must be saying the wrong things
    Why "Nick" and not Nick?

  5. #5

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R View Post
    Why "Nick" and not Nick?
    Another one of life's unsolved mysteries.

  6. #6

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Mrs Steve R View Post
    Why "Nick" and not Nick?
    Cos I always remember his other User ID

  7. #7

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Although 'Nick' courts most of the flak he gets I do think it wrong that someone has been permitted to purloin his earlier nick.

  8. #8

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    It's a real mystery isn't it.
    I spent a pointless 5 minutes looking for that thread and wondering if I
    had just dreamt it all.

    Feel better now but wonder why it was pulled.

  9. #9

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Jim Davidson once had a catchphrase " Nick , " nick " " which seems appropriate.

  10. #10

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    I can still see the thread, so i can see what was written ( i was out till late last night and did not spend alot of time online, so missed it ) , it was crap to be honest, 2 or 3 people then started a argument about reverting to type, then someone started to shout " attention seeker " etc etc

    glad to have helped

  11. #11
    International Mrs Steve R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Barry
    Posts
    29,223
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Cos I always remember his other User ID
    Old habits die hard don't they.

  12. #12

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    To be fair everyone had an opinion on that thread but it remained civil as far as I'd read.

  13. #13

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by dembethewarrior View Post
    To be fair everyone had an opinion on that thread but it remained civil as far as I'd read.
    Yeah, but it was a bit crap though.

  14. #14

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by blue matt View Post
    I can still see the thread, so i can see what was written ( i was out till late last night and did not spend alot of time online, so missed it ) , it was crap to be honest, 2 or 3 people then started a argument about reverting to type, then someone started to shout " attention seeker " etc etc

    glad to have helped
    I think a few might see it another way

  15. #15

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    I see another thread of yours disappeared, you must be saying the wrong things
    He's saying all the right things, just in the wrong order.

    Circa, Morecambe & Wise 1970's

  16. #16

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    Yeah, but it was a bit crap though.
    More unnecessary than crap, but still, by the standards set by some threads then I have no idea why it would be binned. Last time I came on there hasn't been a post on there for hours.

    For me a post slipping out of sight causes less of a fuss that one getting deleted, drags it all back up and you can usually guarantee it will kick off. Been quiet here. Maybe thatsbthe intention.

  17. #17

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by dembethewarrior View Post
    More unnecessary than crap, but still, by the standards set by some threads then I have no idea why it would be binned. Last time I came on there hasn't been a post on there for hours.

    For me a post slipping out of sight causes less of a fuss that one getting deleted, drags it all back up and you can usually guarantee it will kick off. Been quiet here. Maybe thatsbthe intention.
    It's the Mods that run the board so I guess its up to them as to what can stay and what is a bit crap.

  18. #18
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    15,977

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Why should any thread that is 'a bit crap' be deleted?

    Just let it sink.

    Too much stuff is being deleted for no good reason.

    It's as if some mods won't get their monthly bonus unless they hit their 'delete target'!

  19. #19

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    Why should any thread that is 'a bit crap' be deleted?

    Just let it sink.

    Too much stuff is being deleted for no good reason.

    It's as if some mods won't get their monthly bonus unless they hit their 'delete target'!
    I agree with you if a thread is crap it will die on its own

  20. #20

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by jeepster View Post
    I agree with you if a thread is crap it will die on its own
    Well the Mods don’t and it’s their message board and as such they can do exactly what they see fit.

  21. #21

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick View Post
    Well the Mods don’t and it’s their message board and as such they can do exactly what they see fit.
    People are saying your thread should stay and you still find a way to be slightly difficult about it. Amazing.

  22. #22

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by dembethewarrior View Post
    People are saying your thread should stay and you still find a way to be slightly difficult about it. Amazing.
    I’m certainly in no way precious about any thread I start or am involved in. As I said if the mods consider it a bit crap and delete it for that reason then that’s entirely down to them. Not being at all difficult, mate, just expressing my opinion.

  23. #23

  24. #24

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by Vimto View Post

  25. #25

    Re: FAO "Nick"

    Quote Originally Posted by blue matt View Post
    I can still see the thread, so i can see what was written ( i was out till late last night and did not spend alot of time online, so missed it ) , it was crap to be honest, 2 or 3 people then started a argument about reverting to type, then someone started to shout " attention seeker " etc etc

    glad to have helped
    I didnt delete it, But My guess was it wasnt deleted due to it being crap ( though others may have thought it was a highly enlightening thread ? ? ? just for the record, it wasnt ) but due to the fact that a argument had already started on it and we know where it would have headed, even more jumping in on the argument

    glad to have helped again

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •