| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...e-deal-n831436On the orders of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Justice Department prosecutors have begun asking FBI agents to explain the evidence they found in a now dormant criminal investigation into a controversial uranium deal that critics have linked to Bill and Hillary Clinton, multiple law enforcement officials told NBC News.
Claim: Sec. of State Hillary Clinton's approval of a deal to transfer control of 20% of U.S. uranium deposits to a Russian company was a quid pro quo exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Rating: FALSE
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clint...m-russia-deal/
I'm confused who are the bad and good ones in the USA ,I thought the Trump was the one to worry about , among his rants are there some half truths , I do remember him saying something about “draining the swamp” . Love or hate him he ain't part of the politician elite
Trump as president is rather different to Trump the candidate. As the latter he claimed the US unemployment rate is 15% higher than official figures suggest, but since gaining office is content to go along with the fraud. Another example is he said on day one of his presidency he'd declare China is a currency manipulator. He lied.Originally Posted by life on mars
The swamp is now inhabited by different monsters.
Allegedly
Is Tomlin and Bryson too blame ??Allegedly
Uranium One informant makes Clinton allegations to Congress
"An FBI informant connected to the Uranium One controversy told three congressional committees in a written statement that Moscow routed millions of dollars to America with the expectation it would be used to benefit Bill Clinton's charitable efforts while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton quarterbacked a “reset” in U.S.-Russian relations.
The informant, Douglas Campbell, said in the statement obtained by The Hill that he was told by Russian nuclear executives that Moscow had hired the American lobbying firm APCO Worldwide specifically because it was in position to influence the Obama administration, and more specifically Hillary Clinton."
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...s-in-testimony
In addition to his written statement, Campbell on Wednesday was interviewed for several hours behind closed doors by staff from both parties on the Senate Judiciary, the House Intelligence and the House Oversight and Government Reform committees.
Democrats have asked that a transcript of the interview be released to the public, but a court reporter was not present for the interview and Campbell was not sworn in.
Given this is another BOMBSHELL about to go off, any theory on why the Republican committee with the usual suspects managing this latest charade didn't want this vital testimony available for public consumption?
You are probably aware that what we are now witnessing is a carefully laid out strategy that has been prepared with military provision. I am assuming they just wanted to hear the FBI informant's testimony and take possession of any associated documents and tape recordings without all and sundry knowing what they have got. Even the reporting is low key and not giving much away, since we already knew that the Russians gave the Clinton Foundation $135 million dollars.
It could also be that the Justice Department thought the guy was unreliable and on 15th December 2016 they testified to the same committees that as an informant the guy never mentioned Hilary Clinton, so having this on transcript might have this one land with the same dull thud as the Nunes memo I suppose.
I probably missed it but could you post something backing up your assertion that "we already know that the Russians gave the Clinton Foundation $135m dollars?
What's wrong with Nunes memo? It has set up the rest of the game brilliantly.
I'm glad his Trumpness is policing the world with aggression and draining that swamp.
If you have any examples of Trump's great swamp draining successes this is certainly the place to share them!!
For starters 10 senior people in the DOJ & FBI are no longer running amok trying to subvert American democracy.
Name and Shame tiger!
ok if i must
http://theconversation.com/draining-...iticians-73422
Jared Kushner is sorting things out.........😂😂
FBI Interviewed Uranium One Informant in Clinton Foundation Investigation
A former FBI informant who spent more than six years undercover gathering information on the Russian energy and uranium market was recently interviewed by FBI agents from the Little Rock, Arkansas field office as part of an ongoing bureau investigation into the Clinton Foundation, according to Victoria Toensing, the attorney representing the informant.
https://saraacarter.com/fbi-intervie...investigation/
Gosh. After all that mud you chucked at Roy Moore and Trumps' sexual harrassment accusers because they used a partisan lawyer you are taking the word of a partisan conservative lawyer that there is still something in this nonsense. You will be quoting her husband next!
More pertinent is the absolute silence from the Republicans on the committees that heard the testimony of which the Democrats produced a memo of his testimony because the Republican chairs refused to have it transcribed. Normally you cannot keep Jordan, Gowdy, Meadows, DeSantis et al out of a Fox News studio yet they have stuck their dummies in their mouths and you cannot get a word out of them.
Meanwhile you seem to believe that a witness that could provide nothing under oath to representatives of three congressional committees will have something to give to the FBI investigators who are going through process after Sessions cowtowed to a couple of Trump's twitter rants. I see you have this thing bookmarked though which no doubt will give you some comfort.
Yep, you got it right. I think you have become too used to defending the party of leakers, so it has thrown you a bit when you are met with silence. Just wait for the boom and tick-tocks, they are coming
You are probably right, I don't seem to be blessed with the infinite patience you seem to need to be a conspiracy theorist.Yep, you got it right. I think you have become too used to defending the party of leakers, so it has thrown you a bit when you are met with silence. Just wait for the boom and tick-tocks, they are coming
I agree with you, that's why I observe news events at a distance from a neutral perspective.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote