Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
BTW this is not left v right or red v blue, it's about one party using the FBI, CIA, DOJ & other assorted government agencies, along with the majority of the media, plus at least one foreign government/intel agency to stop Trump becoming president, and then to bring him down once he was in office. This same power was also used to protect those in office while they diverted hundreds of millions of dollars through the Clinton Foundation, and also engaged in dodgy business such as Uranium One and the Iranian nuclear deal. This is global in nature and way beyond a single party in a single country.
So you keep on saying, but, despite this modern day tendency to try to pass any party political divide of as old hat and not relevant any more, you only have to look at virtually any debate in any democratic country to see it still in action. My point is that all of your predictions, speculation and links over the past couple of years would look a lot more convincing if the piece you and other seized on this week wasn't just from the one source.

If you are right, are there Democrats out there who have been saying much the same about Hilary Clinton as you do? Surely, there must be some mavericks in that party who are prepared to acknowledge that she is as corrupt as it's alleged she is or are all Democrat politicians observing the party divide and just remaining loyal in spite of everything?