Originally Posted by
Organ Morgan.
Appears to be another obvious false flag. Why would the Russian state opt to attempt to murder someone in a haphazard, convoluted way with an ultra specialised nerve agent while knowing full well it would give a foreign government and controlled corporate media the opportunity to pump anti-Russian propaganda? It wouldn't. Same goes for why on earth would Syria lob poison gas on terrorist held areas when they're winning the conflict with conventional weapons.
Russia has the resources to bump off easy targets anywhere on the planet a thousand different ways. They wouldn't need to risk one of their agents to put a bullet in someone when they could sub it out to any number of assassins.
In the past 10 days Putin delivered a two-hour long State of the Union speech and gave a 90-minute long interview to an American TV network. In the first he revealed that they'd developed a range of hypersonic missiles capable of overcoming all defences. He stated that if Russia was attacked with a nuke he'd respond in kind - i.e. mutually assured destruction. In the TV interview he said some US elites wanted war with Russia but Trump is resisting them. He's been saying that some crazies think they can defeat Russia by launching a shock and awe type blitz; Putin's remarks suggest he'll end all life on earth. including those elites holed-up in DUMBs, as a deterrent.
Reply With Quote