Looks like another bunch of supporters who think that playing pretty but pointless possession football gives you a right to be successful. Has jursset turned into a Fulham fan?
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Looks like another bunch of supporters who think that playing pretty but pointless possession football gives you a right to be successful. Has jursset turned into a Fulham fan?
The difference being that Fulham actually do play some fancy stuff, whereas Bristol are the biggest long ball merchants in the division.Originally Posted by Eric the Half a Bee
Direct and physical football doesn't have to be boring to watch, any more than skilled, technical football has to be exciting.
Some of the great man u sides were very direct, and they were great to watch, and sometimes possession hogs can be tedious.
You can get teams of both styles that set up not to concede, and try to nick an odd goal through an individual error, which can be really dull, but I don't think that applies to us or fulham. We both look to attack and try to win games rather than settle for a draw- just we have different ways of doing it.
^^^^ this, with andy kanchelskis on one wing and giggs on the other, the mantra at united was get it out of defence quickly and get forward. when united did it, it was great counter attacking football, when we do it, it is long ball
So, who has it right and who has it wrong?
The only "stats" that count are the goals for and against stats at the end of 90 minutes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote