Originally Posted by Penarth Blues I wondered why Denmark didn't get the ball out of play as quickly as possible so VAR couldn't be used. teams will wise up to that I guess Does that even make a difference? I didn’t think it did.
Originally Posted by StraightOuttaCanton Does that even make a difference? I didn’t think it did. I think they said in studio in an earlier match that VAR can be used until the ball has gone out of play and come back in.
Originally Posted by Penarth Blues I think they said in studio in an earlier match that VAR can be used until the ball has gone out of play and come back in. What most pundits would know about VAR or indeed football though... BBC and ITV have the ones Sky don't want...
Lucky lucky Denmark. Peru were the better side but they need a striker
Originally Posted by ccfc_is_my_life What most pundits would know about VAR or indeed football though... BBC and ITV have the ones Sky don't want... Like Gary Neville?
Originally Posted by City123 Like Gary Neville? Exception that proves the rule.
Originally Posted by Penarth Blues I think they said in studio in an earlier match that VAR can be used until the ball has gone out of play and come back in. More likely teams will refuse to play the ball ball back in until the ref looks at VAR.
Forum Rules