Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Early on you were saying Kavanaugh was lying, that he was guilty, that he shouldn't be allowed to be a supreme court justice. That sounds like an opinion to me. I said he was being set up. There we have two embedded opinions that haven't changed. I heard what you said about the woman. I said the same thing, so we agreed on that until I changed my opinion, due to the revalation that her best friend and advisor was an FBI/DOJ lawyer. What do you want me to do? Should I give you a medal and tell you how clever you are? Or maybe I should recommend you for an OBE? Why haven't you praised me for my opinion and my new discoveries? Where is your self-awareness? Why are you singling me out, and not the other who don't acknowledge what others have to say, and are a lot ruder than me. For example, I have shown with plenty of evidence that the Trump Russia Collusion narrative is a manufactured construct, and it has been totally ridiciculed. I really don't know where you are going with this, it's all getting rather bizarre

Where did I say he was guilty? I stated that he was dishonest about his past and not that he was guilty of the offence. Thanks for your immature response whilst getting it wrong.

[Wales-Bales]

Where did I say he was guilty? I stated that he was dishonest about his past and not that he was guilty of the offence. Thanks for your immature response whilst getting it wrong.

You said one of them was lying, and then proceeded to build a case to show that Kavanaugh was lying, and you even went as far to say that Ford was more credible than Kavanaugh.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

You said one of them was lying, and then proceeded to build a case that Kavanaugh was lying, even going as far to say that Ford was more credible than Kavanaugh.

Oh dear, oh dear. I didn't state that he was guilty and no matter how many times you post on here you won't change that fact despite your stating that I did. I'll let you have the last word as I know that you will try and convince yourself that you aren't wrong.

[Wales-Bales]

Everybody already has an embedded opinion regarding her testimony, I don't think any factual discussion is going to change what people think. Obviously that may change if the FBI come out with any startling revelations.

Really? I remember saying that she sounded credible but there were inconsistencies in her testimony. Some of us make an effort to be even-minded rather than continually seeing just one side of an argument.

Farkin' hell mate

[Mrs Steve R]

Farkin' hell mate

[Wales-Bales]

Oh dear, oh dear. I didn't state that he was guilty and no matter how many times you post on here you won't change that fact despite your stating that I did. I'll let you have the last word as I know that you will try and convince yourself that you aren't wrong.

It was implied. You initially stated that one of them must be lying. You then spent the rest of the thread attacking Kavanaugh by insinuating he wasn't truthful. Then you declared that Ford was more credible than him.

We now have the FBI report which exonerates Kavanaugh, so by your logic it must have been Ford who was lying. This makes my theory of it being a hit job more credible, yet you say I am the one who only sees one side of things. Then you try to paint yourself as the guy with balanced views when you are clearly very biased. Between you and lardy my head is starting to hurt

[Taunton Blue Genie]

It was implied. You initially stated that one of them must be lying. You then spent the rest of the thread attacking Kavanaugh by insinuating he wasn't truthful. Then you declared that Ford was more credible than him.

We now have the FBI report which exonerates Kavanaugh, so by your logic it must have been Ford who was lying. This makes my theory of it being a hit job more credible, yet you say I am the one who only sees one side of things. Then you try to paint yourself as the guy with balanced views when you are clearly very biased. Between you and lardy my head is starting to hurt

You were wrong in stating that I said he was guilty. Full stop. You can keep waffling until the cows come home but you were wrong.

[Wales-Bales]

You were wrong in stating that I said he was guilty. Full stop. You can keep waffling until the cows come home but you were wrong.

Your logical argument has clearly implied it.

Now if you want to go around accusing people of being one-sided, while showing incredible bias yourself, and then saying things like people lack self-awareness because they failed to answer one of your rhetorical questions, then you can't expect to get a free pass with this sort of behaviour. Worse still were your snidey comments when you were clearly in the wrong. I asked you twice what question you were referring to, and you just adopted a stroppy and arrogant attitude.

Anyway, at least my version of events turned out to be a lot closer to the truth than yours have

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Your logical argument has clearly implied it.

Now if you want to go around accusing people of being one-sided, while showing incredible bias yourself, and then saying things like people lack self-awareness because they failed to answer one of your rhetorical questions, then you can't expect to get a free pass with this sort of behaviour. Worse still were your snidey comments when you were clearly in the wrong. I asked you twice what question you were referring to, and you just adopted a stroppy and arrogant attitude.

Anyway, at least my version of events turned out to be a lot closer to the truth than yours have

Keep waffling.