Another political appointee is facing claims of sexual abuse from the Democrats.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Another political appointee is facing claims of sexual abuse from the Democrats.
Its everwhere
I heard that Kavanaugh left the toilet seat up, failed to replace the toothpaste cap AND whistled on a Tuesday. These crimes happened in 1984.
I heard it's an unprovable allegation, yet a superbly timed attempt to derail a supreme court nomination. Why won't she speak under oath? Why won't the Dems unredact the letter? Why did they keep the letter hidden for months? Why are they insisting that the FBI do something that they never ever do?
Some people seem to be drawing their conclusions that he's innocent quite early. Seems a bit surprising to me, I don't know how anyone can be confident enough to say that considering how little has come out so far.
If I was him, assuming I was innocent, I would welcome a proper investigation to clear my name, particularly given the job and the sexual cases that he'll no doubt rule over. Why would he want to have a cloud of suspicion around him for decades?
The FBI have done something in very similar circumstances before (Anita Hills) and it took just a few days. Interestingly, Orrin Hatch who sits on the Judiciary Committee for the nomination, said "The FBI does not do investigations like this. The responsibility falls to us.", but also said that the FBI investigating the Anita Hills case in 1991 was "the very right and appopriate thing to do".
Why don't they want Mark Judge, supposed to have been in the room at the time, to testify under oath? Then it would be two voices against one. His memoirs seem interesting though, particularly the bits about his friend Bart O'Kavanaugh.
Most of the committee have publicly said they want any hearing over and done with quickly. They've said they'll listen to the lady but want to bring it to a close (Graham), they should listen on Monday if it happens but then vote (Corker), said it's a hiccup (Heller). Mike Davis, who'd be doing the questioning, said he was unfazed and determined to get Kavanaugh confirmed. You have to wonder how fair the hearing will be, or if it's a box ticking exercise.
Either Ford or Kavanaugh is lying. Who stands to gain most by lying?
It's the same old democrat playbook, and there are already a lot of red flags surrounding the event. The FBI were involved over Anita Hill because both parties were federal employees. Don't you think it's about time that you started getting your news from reliable sources?
So, there were alledegdly 5 people at the house, and 4 of them have issued statements saying they weren't there. They only person who hasn't made a statement is the accuser who told her therapist there were 4 men, and then told the Washington Post reporter it it was 3 men and 1 woman. This was known by at least the 16 Sept when the reporter contacted an alledged witness.
Now Stormy Daniels lawyer has joined in. Michael Avenatti has alledged that Kavanaugh was in charge of a marauding rape gang that went from house party to house party, raping all and sundry in their path. Brace yourselves, we are probably going to be hearing about farm animals next!
I know how you like having your back copy regurgitated so here is another one from your gold collection (I took the liberty of replacing the word Democrat with Republican to bring it up to date but otherwise left your original spelling!
Stormy Daniels seems to have slipped off the news radar after a big name Republican is accused of assaulting multiple women during sex encounters, in what could be one of the biggest cases of hypocracy seen so far.
The Katz out of the bag!
A new statement has just been released by Debra Katz (pictured above), the attorney who represents Dr Ford. It looks like everything is going according to plan. Just need to drag it all out past the mid-term elections and mission accomplished.
A third woman has come forward. If it's not true, they're certainly taking a big risk.
Below is my correspondence to Mr. Davis of moments ago, together with a sworn declaration from my client. We demand an immediate FBI investigation into the allegations. Under no circumstances should Brett Kavanaugh be confirmed absent a full and complete investigation. pic.twitter.com/QHbHBbbfbE
— Michael Avenatti (@MichaelAvenatti) September 26, 2018
I'm with crazy uncle Joe Biden on this one!
Michael Avenatti @MichaelAvenatti
.@realDonaldTrump @ChuckGrassley @LindseyGrahamSC - Are you three privileged, white men calling my client Julie a liar? How dare you attack a sexual assault victim. She has risked her life to do the right thing. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Your actions are disgraceful.
12:14 pm - 26 Sep 2018
https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/...28934277115905
I know I shouldn't laugh, but we do seem to be getting closer to the truth..
I know I shouldn't laugh but I worked with Jill Saward, the victim of the Ealing Vicarage rape which appears in the bottom left of your fantastic chuckle. The perpetrators got more time for the burglary than the rape because the Judge concluded that the trauma suffered by the victim was not so great. Interesting insight into the attitudes at the time but also on how far we have progressed in 30 years!