Abuse accustations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh

[Wales-Bales]

Fox News is also a right wing media outlet, in case anyone hadn't guessed.

https://theintercept.com/2018/10/30/...-donald-trump/

Fox News was borne out of Nixon idea for getting the GOP on TV news, apparently. I mean, no-one seeking to hold themselves up as a completely objective, floating-above-the-ignorant-masses, non-partisan type would go near them, would they?

What's that got to do with the FACTS of the Kavanaugh case? And since you have broached the subject, do you have any critical thoughts regarding the left wing media?

[Bluebirdman Of Alcathays]

When did I broach the subject of left wing media?

[Wales-Bales]

When did I broach the subject of left wing media?

Fox News are greatly outnumbered by the Democrat supporting liberal media broadcast organisations, or did that escape your attention? So, Fox News very bad, Democrat supporting news networks very good.

[Bluebirdman Of Alcathays]

Fox News are outnumbered by the Democrat supporting liberal media broadcast companies, or did that escape your attention? So, Fox News very bad, Democrat supporting news networks very good.

So when did I broach the subject of left wing media?

[Wales-Bales]

So when did I broach the subject of left wing media?

You randomly brought up the topic of various news organisations supporting specific political parties, and I expanded upon it!

Now just for giggles, I googled Trump & Nixon, and to my surprise all of the liberal media are running stories on the same theme! Is this a coincidence or perhaps something more orchestrated?



BTW, if you haven't had your fill of Trump/Nixon related news I recommend this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episod...rump-what-next

[Bluebirdman Of Alcathays]

No, it wasn't random. I brought up the political persuasions of the websites/media you were linking, because they often seem to be linked to the right. Then you took it in a different direction, probably to avoid the question?

[Wales-Bales]

No, it wasn't random. I brought up the political persuasions of the websites/media you were linking, because they often seem to be linked to the right. Then you took it in a different direction, probably to avoid the question?

Everything in the report was factual. It this your way of trying to discredit facts?

[Bluebirdman Of Alcathays]

Everything in the report was factual. It this your way of trying to discredit facts?

Wrong, and no. I pointed out the right wing media in your posts because you have a habit of laughing down your sleeve whenever someone posts something from the liberal media. The idea that someone from a right wing website (and yourself) might not be wholly objective seems to have passed you by.

[Wales-Bales]

Wrong, and no. I pointed out the right wing media in your posts because you have a habit of laughing down your sleeve whenever someone posts something from the liberal media. The idea that someone from a right wing website (and yourself) might not be wholly objective seems to have passed you by.

So, I post a report that sums up the factual consequences of the Kavenaugh case, and then you divert to some left wing website, where a former Michael Moore assistant is giving his OPINION on a totally unrelated matter.

[Bluebirdman Of Alcathays]

So, I post a report that sums up the factual consequences of the Kavenaugh case, and then you divert to some left wing website, where a former Michael Moore assistant is giving his OPINION on a totally unrelated matter.

Not factual; an interpretation. You'd be the first to discredit a story just by pointing to the source, so I was suggesting that posting reports from right wing websites, one of which is the propaganda arm of the Republican Party (and providing a link which possibly has evidence for that) might not be the way to proceed.

[Wales-Bales]

Michael Avenatti Arrested for Felony Domestic Violence

http://www.tmz.com/2018/11/14/michae...iels-attorney/