+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Added time yesterday

  1. #1

    Added time yesterday

    Peltier was clearly being treated for over 5 minutes early in the second half.
    5 substitutions in the second half other than the Peltier one.

    Should have been 8 added minutes by my reckoning. They gave 3. Not even remotely close to accuracy.

    Leaving aside the fact we were 5-0 down was this a glaring timing error by the officials or can they cheat teams like Man City out of scoring time.

  2. #2

    Re: Added time yesterday

    3 minutes were more than enough

  3. #3

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Quote Originally Posted by AlwaysAway2 View Post
    Peltier was clearly being treated for over 5 minutes early in the second half.
    5 substitutions in the second half other than the Peltier one.

    Should have been 8 added minutes by my reckoning. They gave 3. Not even remotely close to accuracy.

    Leaving aside the fact we were 5-0 down was this a glaring timing error by the officials or can they cheat teams like Man City out of scoring time.
    It must have been a genuine error. 3 minutes equals the 6 subs, ignoring Peltier injury. I suspect that neither Warnock or Gladiola were too bothered...

  4. #4

    Re: Added time yesterday

    An error or professional refereeing sympathy. Either way its shambolic timekeeping.

  5. #5

    Re: Added time yesterday

    I would have been happy to let them have it and end on the 90.

  6. #6

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Most fans thought it finished after 60 mins.

  7. #7

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Man City fans not happy on the Blue Moon forum, wary of goal difference being a factor at the end of the season, one cheeky fecker also suggested that hed be annoyed if we stayed up on goal difference because of it. Me, I thought theyd declared!!! 🤣

  8. #8

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Quote Originally Posted by AlwaysAway2 View Post
    Peltier was clearly being treated for over 5 minutes early in the second half.
    5 substitutions in the second half other than the Peltier one.

    Should have been 8 added minutes by my reckoning. They gave 3. Not even remotely close to accuracy.

    Leaving aside the fact we were 5-0 down was this a glaring timing error by the officials or can they cheat teams like Man City out of scoring time.
    Yep, should have been at least 8 minutes

  9. #9

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Yeh, we picked up on this one too as PB says should have been at least 8 minutes. Warnock had spoken to the fourth official very shortly before he put up the 3 minutes, but surely there is no room for that type of throwing in the towel, or ref sympathy. An additional 5 minutes could have lead to more goals which could be crucial for either team at the end of the season.

  10. #10

    Re: Added time yesterday

    We discussed this too in pub after the game , 6 substitutes.? , 2 goals plus Peltier injury should have been about 9 minutes extra ! I said perhaps it was meant to be 13 and 4th official forgot the first digit ?

  11. #11

    Re: Added time yesterday

    The game was well refereed. Many refs would have sent Ralls off. The extra time thing was probably the only mistake.

  12. #12

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Quote Originally Posted by Penarth Blues View Post
    Yep, should have been at least 8 minutes
    I could have watched it for hours after the 90 ,I'd still be there now, if the lights could be left on.

  13. #13

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Small mercy from the ref. Not sure it should happen when there is so much at stake (over the season, not at 5 nil down). Who is to say what may have happened over another 5 minutes wont have an effect on the league table at the end. Of course it didn't just happen yesterday either.

    Also if I had money riding on another goal I'd be annoyed.

  14. #14

    Re: Added time yesterday

    There was a discussion about how much added time there would be with about two minutes of the ninety left where I was sat and the consensus was it would be at least eight minutes. Surely if we are all supposed to be "enjoying the ride", we should be disappointed that we were denied the chance to watch another five minutes of our side taking a hammering in the pouring rain?

  15. #15

    Re: Added time yesterday

    Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    There was a discussion about how much added time there would be with about two minutes of the ninety left where I was sat and the consensus was it would be at least eight minutes. Surely if we are all supposed to be "enjoying the ride", we should be disappointed that we were denied the chance to watch another five minutes of our side taking a hammering in the pouring rain?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •