Official: On this day last year thread

[cyril evans awaydays]

Thank you for highlighting the two rules of law, where certain people escape punishment because of their position in society and who they know.

You seem to be quite smug regarding the bumping old threads, while ignoring the fact that people were the victims of sexual abuse, and public money was used to make these accusations go away. All of this information was recorded in a secret register, which wasn't meant to see the light of day. Although a few were held to account, many got away with their crimes.

It's a shame that you didn't show the same gusto regarding Jeffrey Epstein, when you could have just as easily bumbed his old thread, but that wouldn't serve your agenda would it.

It is clear to see that you are a flawed character Cyril the Stalker™ who will gladly overlook things, as long as the end justifies the means.

I noticed that you have recently revived an aged thread that now has eight posts exclusively by you as a precursor to your post. The self indulgence aside, what has it got to do with the bollocks you posted a year ago?

[Wales-Bales]

I noticed that you have recently revived an aged thread that now has eight posts exclusively by you as a precursor to your post. The self indulgence aside, what has it got to do with the bollocks you posted a year ago?

Not revived, updated with the latest current news dear boy. Why are you trying to brush those articles off as being insignificant? Maybe you should try reading them, and then you may come to a different conclusion.

What is becoming absolutely clear is that Cyril the Stalker™ and the truth will never appear in the same sentence, and all you have left is personal digs and an obsession to discredit those with different views.

You are a sad man Cyril the Stalker™ using victims of sexual abouse in this way to score points, but thanks all the same for bringing to our attention examples of how the system really works, the same system that you try to defend on a daily basis.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Not revived, updated with the latest current news dear boy. Why are you trying to brush those articles off as being insignificant? Maybe you should try reading them, and then you may come to a different conclusion.

What is becoming absolutely clear is that Cyril the Stalker™ and the truth will never appear in the same sentence, and all you have left is personal digs and an obsession to discredit those with different views.

You are a sad man Cyril the Stalker™ using victims of sexual abouse in this way to score points, but thanks all the same for highlighting how the system really works.

So sometimes ad hominem good, sometimes bad eh! Anyway if you have anything to support what your Epstein onanism has to do with the bollocks you posted a year then fill your boots

[Wales-Bales]

So sometimes ad hominem good, sometimes bad eh! Anyway if you have anything to support what your Epstein onanism has to do with the bollocks you posted a year then fill your boots

Well, it's the two rules of law that you clearly support and defend isn't it.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Well, it's the two rules of law that you clearly support and defend isn't it.

What do you mean by two rules of law? Quoting them would be good.

[Wales-Bales]

What do you mean by two rules of law? Quoting them would be good.

It would be a waste of time, because first you would need to be capable of thinking independently, which you have shown on countless occasions that you aren't.

[cyril evans awaydays]

It would be a waste of time, because first you would need to be capable of thinking independently, which you have shown on countless occasions that you aren't.

Ok, I'll accept one rule of law as you are obviously struggling!