Garth Crooks.

[Rock_Flock_of_Five]

He is quite simply the worst pundit I have ever seen on TV. Tries to be eloquent and thoughtful, and just comes across as thick as pig shit.
Think Chris Eubank.

He's absolutely terrible and talks in clichés.

[Joe Gillis]

He's absolutely terrible and talks in clichés.

He also uses his hands for emphasis, leans into the interviewer for dramatic effect, talks in pauses, very quietly as if he has just solved the meaning of life.
Grade A Twat.

[cyril evans awaydays]

Given that he references awful tackles where Cardiff players have stayed on the pitch I would presume his reference points are the furore around Bennett on Sane and to a lesser extent Arter against Newcastle. I say that because 1) I can't think of any others and 2) I doubt Crooks would have spent a moment watching us unless we were playing against a Premier League team.

I think there has been some reasonable comment on this board about the amount of time other teams spend ganged up in the faces of referees at certain incidents and we have perhaps overplayed the offended innocents watching our response that got one of our key players needlessly cautioned.

But to judge Crooks by his own standards you would expect this man of principle to call out Chelsea the next time they surround a referee given the horrendous assault that Jorginho committed on Sigurdsson yesterday whilst staying on the pitch should he name any of their players in his team of the week.

[Taunton Blue Genie]

He's absolutely terrible and talks in clichés.

I don't know how he keeps down his job. He doesn't say anything of value whilst trying to sound profound.

[Bobby Dandruff]

I don't know how he keeps down his job. He doesn't say anything of value whilst trying to sound profound.

You don't know how he keeps his job, despite being utterly useless and irrelevant?

Think about it.......