Should not be allowed. Poor Southampton would have won on Saturday have no doubt.
Death should allow a caretaker from within the club to stand in. Otherwise no manager should change except in the window.
Discuss.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Should not be allowed. Poor Southampton would have won on Saturday have no doubt.
Death should allow a caretaker from within the club to stand in. Otherwise no manager should change except in the window.
Discuss.
Makes sense
What a cracking suggestion. 100% agree
I'd draw the curtains before the missus got an eyeful.
After seeing Harry Redknapp crack-washing in the jungle showers the other day I think this is a very good suggestion.
I think clubs should be able to what they want regarding managers.
The windows are hectic and crazy enough.
Why should you have to ride out half the season with a failing manager? Or worse, with a manager that knows he's getting sacked on January 1st? Managers have agents too. How would we feel if we had a manager that was already tapped up to go somewhere else? Or manager that was waiting for a phone call all month only to suddenly end up elsewhere at 11pm on January 31st?
We'd have gone down if we stuck with Trollope until Jan 1st. We comfortably stayed up under Warnock but Warnock picked up 16 points in 2016, and 3 more on Jan 2nd (Warnock wouldn't have been able to turn things around in a day!), so 19 in 12 games. We'd have got 8 points under Trollope, so an 11 point gain. We stayed up by 11 points.
Obviously, that's highly subjective but I think we'd have struggled had Warnock come in January as opposed to October.
Injuries? To who? This is the team from his last game, pretty much full strength and my God, it was bad.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/37460401
More nonsense from always away
What is remarkable is in both City teams on the links are 7 players who are now in our Premier league squad
I heard a number of pundits talking about Trollope's position as our manager at the time. The general consensus was that Trollope is great being out with the players on the coaching field but, as manager, would have spent most of his time in the office dealing with the crap that goes with being in charge. I can't recall any one of them saying that it was a position that Trollope would grow into. Some people don't make the step up and become good managers, regardless of how much time they're given.
For me, the only shame is that we didn't keep hold of him as a coach.
On the other hand, there is more than one way of being a manager. If you have a weakness in your skill set then improve or bring someone else in to over that aspect. Some managers spend a lot of time on the training pitch, others leave that to the coaches entirely.
Or it could be that Trollope is an excellent coach, useless manager and shouldn't have been given the job in the first place.
I'm not blaming Trollope in any of this, or knocking his abilities by the way. Far from it. But at the time, his position as manager clearly wasn't working and our performances, morale etc were plummetting. It wasn't as if things were starting to get better. They were getting worse. That says 100% that Trollope wasn't suitable for the requirements of being a manager. In the end he chopped and changed personnel and formations so often trying to find a winning formula, that it went tits up. He, along with Solskjaer, were our worst two managers since the millennium. Slightly ironic, that, because Slade was arguably propped up by Trollope's excellence as a coach and assistant, but Slade could manage. Trollope clearly couldn't.