Blatant Electioneering Or Caring??

[life on mars]

Bingo. Yet you refer to it as potentially 'blatant electioneering' above? Make your mind up.

It will create youth unemployment , need to concentrate on youngsters staying in school and bettering themselves not jumping into wages that are attractive ,not a sensible decesion in my view just another undeliverable vote grabber ,bit like tution fees ,I'm sure a reversal or amended view will follow, as per the free tution fee banner ,free bus travel ??,free sweets ?? , we will end up subsiding them to not achieve if we're not careful .

This will create higher youth employment as business will reduce and higher less people .

[Eric Cartman]

It will create youth unemployment, need to concentrate on youngsters staying in school and bettering themselves not jumping into wages that are attractive ,not a sensible decesion in my view just another undeliverable vote grabber ,bit like tution fees ,I'm sure a reversal or amended view will follow, as per the free tution fee banner ,free bus travel ??,free sweets ?? , we will end up subsiding them to not achieve if we're not careful .

This will create higher youth employment as business will reduce and higher less people .

a) If you think the policy will make kids less employable and you want kids to stay in education then surely you should like the policy?

b) How can this policy be a vote grabber if the people it benefits can't vote?