Tommy Robinson

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Good to see anti Semitic dog whistling alive and well on comb.

The state of this board ffs.

This board is going to the dogs. I blame the whistling.

[Croesy Blue]

There are a few posters on here who appear to be a sandwich short if a picnic. I’d say you’re one of them.

It’s well known though, why don’t you look it up?

Weren’t you crying about being attacked rather than debated a page ago?

[Croesy Blue]

Maybe non practicing Muslim makes it a little clearer for you.

Here’s a question do you think atheist David Baddiel would have been safe in Nazi Germany ?

No response other than laughing smileys?

[Organ Morgan.]

I observed on another thread at the more refined Politics forum that the anti-Semite slur is only ever slung with regard to a relatively minuscule, but extraordinarily influential, group of Semitic people while other Semites and their lands (Gaza, Libya, Syria and Iraq) can be blitzed mercilessly and all the while those doing the bombing never get tagged with the same label.

[rudy gestede]

Haha when solving world problems you have to start off with a worst case scenario. If you think Soros and his chums are going to go quietly you've got another thing coming. There are some very powerful players involved and no responses will be off the table. 2017/2018 will be momentous. The free world is depending on Trump & co to save them, but first he has to do battle with lardy & friends

Nothing is off the table mate. Those globalists are tricky buggers, they may even try to crash the global economy and kickstart their plan for population reduction. Prince William, his dad and grandad has already warned us!

There is the recent Saudi blueprint though, roundup all the nasties and free mankind. Hopefully they are being interrigated and are spilling the names of everybody else who is invovled in this global conspiracy.

Yeah no anti semitism here, you got me about all those bombs I dropped though.

[rudy gestede]

The best thing for everyone posting in this thread and every other thread about “globalists” is take a week off the Internet, your minds have been poisoned

http://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php...i-Arabia-today

[William Treseder]

It’s well known though, why don’t you look it up?

Weren’t you crying about being attacked rather than debated a page ago?

No. That was your choice of phrase, not mine.

[jeepster]

I observed on another thread at the more refined Politics forum that the anti-Semite slur is only ever slung with regard to a relatively minuscule, but extraordinarily influential, group of Semitic people while other Semites and their lands (Gaza, Libya, Syria and Iraq) can be blitzed mercilessly and all the while those doing the bombing never get tagged with the same label.

BEST POST TO DAY

[Wales-Bales]

Yeah no anti semitism here, you got me about all those bombs I dropped though.

Show me where? I must have missed it.

[the other bob wilson]

Well said TBG, people are either globalists or non-globalists. All other labels are used to divide us.

What do you mean by non globalists?

[Wales-Bales]

What do you mean by non globalists?

The group who aren't globalists, loosely speaking those who are forming alliences with the current US administration. It's difficult to define precisely, as the groupings are not based on nationality, ethnicity or religion, it's purely ideological.

[Rjk]

What do you mean by non globalists?

Nationalists

[Wales-Bales]

Nationalists

Framing it as nationalism v socialism/communism is the simplistic view.

[Croesy Blue]

The group who aren't globalists, loosely speaking those who are forming alliences with the current US administration. It's difficult to define precisely, as the groupings are not based on nationality, ethnicity or religion, it's purely ideological.

What is the ideology and who are the main players?

Is there anywhere reputable that has information about this?

[Rjk]

Framing it as nationalism v socialism/communism is the simplistic view.

I wasn't, I was framing it as nationalism Vs globalism. It is a different axis to socialism / capitalism.

One is the scope at which you try to address issues, the other is the philosophy you use to try to address them.

[Rjk]

I observed on another thread at the more refined Politics forum that the anti-Semite slur is only ever slung with regard to a relatively minuscule, but extraordinarily influential, group of Semitic people while other Semites and their lands (Gaza, Libya, Syria and Iraq) can be blitzed mercilessly and all the while those doing the bombing never get tagged with the same label.

The irony being in many places this post istelf would be considered anti Semitic

[the other bob wilson]

The group who aren't globalists, loosely speaking those who are forming alliences with the current US administration. It's difficult to define precisely, as the groupings are not based on nationality, ethnicity or religion, it's purely ideological.

Thanks for the reply. From a personal perspective, the problem I have with it is that, as far as I can see, the leaders which most represent the views you describe are arrogant, preening populists who always have to have an "enemy" to fight as a means to try to avoid examination into the lack of depth in their policies.

[Wales-Bales]

I wasn't, I was framing it as nationalism Vs globalism. It is a different axis to socialism / capitalism.

One is the scope at which you try to address issues, the other is the philosophy you use to try to address them.

How do equate anti-globalism as being another name for nationalism?

[Rjk]

How do equate anti-globalism as being another name for nationalism?

Is that a question?

[Organ Morgan.]

Some super-sized Kosher sausages.

[Wales-Bales]

Is that a question?

Not agreeing with globalist agendas and/or actions doesn't make you a nationalist, but it would make you anti-globalist.

[City123]

Framing it as nationalism v socialism/communism is the simplistic view.

He wasn't

[Rjk]

Not agreeing with globalist agendas and/or actions doesn't make you a nationalist, but it would make you anti-globalist.

In a broad sense it does.

Nationalism is a country looking after its own interests, regardless on the effects on others

Globalism is countries working together to solve problems that cannot be addressed by individual countries.

If you have your own marked definition for those terms then of course you might not agree

[Wales-Bales]

In a broad sense it does.

Nationalism is a country looking after its own interests, regardless on the effects on others

Globalism is countries working together to solve problems that cannot be addressed by individual countries.

If you have your own marked definition for those terms then of course you might not agree

Nationalism is a modern construct that came about with the fairly recent trend of forming individual states. The EU is a state, so joining the EU was all about us giving up our own sovereignty, in favour of integration into a larger state!

I also reject your naive view of globalism.

[Rjk]

Nationalism is a modern construct that came about with the fairly recent trend of forming individual states. The EU is a state, so joining the EU was all about us giving up our own sovereignty, in favour of integration into a larger state!

I also reject your naive view of globalism.

Let's hear your definition of globalism then