Reply With QuoteThis is true.Originally Posted by JDerrida
| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Freedom of speech, mate.
This is true.
I was very hesitant in posting the above message, as I'm not sure of Hindenberg's newly defined message board etiquette.
Are we allowed to reply or dare acknowledge a message that was in reply to another message.
Sadly, also I couldn't help reacting to an abusive and aggressive poster.
You replied directly to my comment last night as if it was targeted at you... Even though it was clearly a reply to the poster that I quoted in my message. You felt insecure andwent on the defensive... like a child.
I'm sure that you're a big boy and can handle the words used against you though.
😂😂
I hope I'm allowed to reply, but ... 😂👍
I acknowledged and appreciated your link.
My earlier comments in that post was in reply to a number of other posters, as I didn't want to type in Robinson's name in work.
It was by way of an explanation rather than being defensive or child like.
However, unsolicited name calling is childlike.
All you had to do, was to say that the message wasnt intended for me. No problem.
You chose to name call and it says a lot about the content of your character.
You're right, I'm quite content with my character.
How did you spend your Saturday afternoon?
Oh I spent it on the Internet pontificating over **** all with other like minded sad bastards.
You're lack of ambition to self improve is quite sad!!
I'm sure you'll get over it eventually.
😂😂🤣 that's laughable coming from someone who will argue with his own shadow, has over 6,600 posts and on average posts 5.5 times a day!!
Yep!!
This is sad looking at a posters history.
Why?This is sad looking at a posters history.
He made a post criticising me and another poster for posting on a Saturday afternoon.
It was unsolicited.
He chose to make that criticism.
I don't live on this forum, but believed that he/she was a prolific poster and wanted to check to confirm before posting.
I thought that his comments were laughable and hypocritical.
They certainly weren't constructive.
Other posters have in the past commented on the number of posts that other contributors have posted. Did you make similar comments then?
Just post on the topic,why go the posters history
Is this another rule of this forum?
If I want to check to confirm that the poster was a hypocrite, then I can damn well do that.
Why are you so outraged?
It's got feck all to do with you.
A comment was made earlier about the different reactions of both boards. To be fair ive read the other board and theres a minority on there accusing people criticising yaxley-whatever his real name is as being lefties etc.
Just one person throwing the lefty sh!t about on this one.
Using labels such a right-wing, lefties, millennials, snowflakes etc is all a waste of time. People need to concentrate on the issues in hand in any debate.
It is on a forum you posted so we can all be involved in the topic.
JDerrida: Still waiting for you to explain what "blinkered loony left narrative" means in the context of the thread.
Well said TBG, people are either globalists or non-globalists. All other labels are used to divide us.
People aren’t outraged with these things though they just disagree with them, look in the Morrissey thread, no one is outraged they just think he’s a twat.
People need to see the difference between outrage and disagreement.
Good to see anti Semitic dog whistling alive and well on comb.
The state of this board ffs.
There are a few posters on here who appear to be a sandwich short if a picnic. I’d say you’re one of them.
Posting Permissions