Quote Originally Posted by William Treseder View Post
It’s quite pathetic comparing Women’s football to men’s. Why do some people constantly do it?
Just enjoy it for what it is, or don’t watch it if you don’t like it.
It’s as daft as comparing different men’s sports.
A top 10 tennis player would hammer a top 10 squash player at tennis, and vice versa.
The world 8 ball champion would hammer Judd Trump at* 8 ball and vice versa etc etc.
It is interesting why people do compare, and I know a few.
Here's a theory, topical too...

Almost all men in the top 100 would beat Serena Williams (or whoever is No. 1 these days).
Yet the prize money for this year's Wimbledon singles is the same for the women's winner and the men's winner.
It could be argued that this is a bit unfair, especially as the men play a minimum of three sets per match and the women a maximum of three.
The fairer sex had battled to receive their "fair" share of the spoils for ages and won. Good luck to them!

However, perhaps (I'm guessing here) people are thinking that there may be similar parity in the coming years in football?

Of course there is always the possibility that these people have a female boss