| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Or better still " The US launched a cyber-attack on Iranian weapons systems on Thursday as President Trump pulled out of air strikes on the country"Originally Posted by jeremy corbyn
With regards to Saudi your wrong about bombing ,you cant be in disgust at USA bombing Syria or Iran ,and suggest Saudi is okay to bomb , surely any bombing is a poor behavior
****ing hell lucky Holmes and Watson have uncovered that the UK have a relationship with Saudi Arabia, get onto the papers lads.
Gezza needed reminding
If you're so smart, name names or STFU, cos you ain't adding anything to the conversation
If you're so smart, name names or STFU, cos you ain't adding anything to the conversation
Was he (45) flushing out leaks with his I'm gunna attack, na I've changed my mind.
Need more info, who was pushing for the strikes, etc.. It could even be part of a bigger game, with the China trade negotiations coming up next week. The Chinese economy is already feeling the heat due to US tarrifs and companies pulling out. If their flow of oil is disrupted they will be in more trouble. However, I fully expect the US to negotiate mutually beneficial trade deals with China, North Korea & Iran, but they may need a bit of gentle persuasion first.
Q Brigade are on to it
q.jpg
It was the hawks in the Pentagon who wanted the strike and it was Trump that stopped it before it started. I'd say that was a pretty good sign, given his perceive lunacy!!!
“We didn’t have a man or woman in the drone. It would have made a big, big difference,” Trump said.
Oh...kay then 😕
I can understand that the way he sees it, it would have. He may be a lot of things but he is certainly pro-USA to the detriment of everything else.
It's a factual statement mate, there was no man or woman in the drone. I just asked 3 people, and 2 of them didn't even know that large military drones were flown remotely. The relevant information in that statement is that there were no US casualties. Maybe you are just too clever, even for yourself
A man or woman in the drone...
I repeat... IN the drone.
Fair play if you can understand that.
To me, it appears as though the leader of the free world doesn't know what a f**king drone is.
I know what droning on is, and for some reason you were the first thing that came to mind
All the pro Iranians will soon start moaning when they close the straights of Hormuz and send oil prices over the hill effecting petrol prices and thier lives.
Lets not kid ourselves when Iran prop up Hamas and Hezbollah,PLO there not doing it out of love ,its hatred , why are they camped in Syria ??
Once again the denial team are up and running , its almost as if they watch the world and can only see one view a very blinkered one at that .
Bloody region is lead by evil people who have little care for thier own , no democracy , just torture ,imprisonment and mediveal laws.
Yes the USA and UK have thier nasty agendas, but at least their own people can
practice (freely ) thier choice of religion, woman have rights, children have access to broader education
LBGT communities don,'t have to suffer persecution.
People don't get stoned to death .
Folk dont lose their limbs for theft crime .
Females dont suffer genital mutilation.
I could go on for hours listing thier mediveal practices .
Barbaric nutters,
Thier yours to love, crack on.
They're drones!It's a factual statement mate, there was no man or woman in the drone. I just asked 3 people, and 2 of them didn't even know that large military drones were flown remotely. The relevant information in that statement is that there were no US casualties. Maybe you are just too clever, even for yourself
Your defence of Trump knows no bounds. It's cute.
No need to repeat it. I can read . But he obviously meant it would be a different response I'd the had taken down a manned flight. It is that interpretation I was referring to when I said I could understand his response given his US first rhetoric. To suggest he meant it literally is taking people's attitude to him a little far.
Following people around and looking for semantic ambiguities is one of Heisenburg's peculiarities. In fact, you would be very hard pressed to see him express an original opinion. I think it's happened once! Why he does it is a question for the scientists, but I reckon it is related to self-esteem issues, and a continual desire to appear clever. It just comes across as being very weird behaviour to me though
You are really calling out other posters for 'weird behaviour'?Following people around and looking for semantic ambiguities is one of Heisenburg's peculiarities. In fact, you would be very hard pressed to see him express an original opinion. I think it's happened once! Why he does it is a question for the scientists, but I reckon it is related to self-esteem issues, and a continual desire to appear clever. It just comes across as being very weird behaviour to me though
Seriously?
My flabber has never been more gasted!
You're two minutes late, I was sure you would show up before 8pm!
Well, to be fair I only look in now and again. You live here.You're two minutes late, I was sure you would show up before 8pm!
I think I touched a nerveFollowing people around and looking for semantic ambiguities is one of Heisenburg's peculiarities. In fact, you would be very hard pressed to see him express an original opinion. I think it's happened once! Why he does it is a question for the scientists, but I reckon it is related to self-esteem issues, and a continual desire to appear clever. It just comes across as being very weird behaviour to me though
Reports indicate Iran's air force has been placed on its highest state of readiness.
I.jpg
If only. The Iranian air force is pretty sophisticated and well equipped. It has twice and many aircraft as the RAF.
Who supplies their kit?
Adidas.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote