+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
How you view that picture depends on your agenda.
I see under-resourced police officers catching a criminal and transporting him to custody in an environmentally sound way at minimal cost to the tax payer. Guess I have no reason to be bothered about something that was banned in the USA in 1865 though.
They use the same process for white felons. Racist would be to change it just because the guy is black.
That guy has never been a slave, his parents weren't slaves, the people complaining weren't slaves. Why does everyone have to be offended by everything all the time.
I just don't see how anyone can look at this photo, whatever race the guy is and say yes this is fine.
Unrelated but Galveston, where the photo was taken, was the birthplace of Jack Johnson, the world's first boxing heavyweight champion.
I was on a ship in Galveston, went ashore on their Mardi Gras day, by time I walked in to a pub, lots of them had had quite a bit to drink, singing and dancing, basically in party mode, so I said to one local that it seemed everyone was so much more happy since Obama had become President. 'We didn't vote for that feckin' ****** down here' he replied, then went on a tirade against my tongue in cheek comment. I should imagine he's well happy with his current president.
I know you're trolling, but I'll respond anyway for the benefit of others who may have missed the last part of your post.
The image in question is evocative of lynchings as well as slavery. Lynchings were still taking place long after the abolition of slavery in 1865.
Is it racist? I don't know. Does it look like an incredibly misjudged decision that could be perceived as being racist? Definitely.
That sir, is a stretch. Lynchings, on the whole, after 1865, were carried out by mobs, often dressed in sheets and usually under cover of darkness, not by two police officers in the main street in broad daylight. And prior to 1865 the majority of lynchings had white victims(horse thieves etc), so not really seeing your point.