+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 13 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 322

Thread: Updated: Isaac Vassell in - Bobby Reid out?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Taarabt had the best season of his career by a million miles under Warnock. Warnock deserves all the credit for that, as he's the only one that managed to get him to pull his finger out.
    Perhaps, but did Warnock ‘resurrect’ his career or did Tarrabt simply have one good season under him before the pair fell out?

  2. #2

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Perhaps, but did Warnock ‘resurrect’ his career or did Tarrabt simply have one good season under him before the pair fell out?
    Taarabt was going nowhere, Warnock turned him into the best player in the division and then they fell out. QPR was a basket case when they went up though.

  3. #3

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Taarabt was going nowhere, Warnock turned him into the best player in the division and then they fell out. QPR was a basket case when they went up though.
    Taarabt was a first team regular at QPR when Warnock arrived. No doubt he improved him (briefly), but the player also went backwards under Warnock. I don’t think he resurrected Taarabt’s career.

    Chopra played his best football under Jones. Does that mean Jones resurrected Chopra’s career, or does it simply mean he signed him, improved him and sold him on?

    If a manager signs a player who was previously decent but has gone downhill, and the manager gets the best out of him again, I’d regard that as resurrecting a career. I can’t think of anyone who’s done that under Warnock.

  4. #4

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Taarabt was a first team regular at QPR when Warnock arrived. No doubt he improved him (briefly), but the player also went backwards under Warnock. I don’t think he resurrected Taarabt’s career.

    Chopra played his best football under Jones. Does that mean Jones resurrected Chopra’s career, or does it simply mean he signed him, improved him and sold him on?

    If a manager signs a player who was previously decent but has gone downhill, and the manager gets the best out of him again, I’d regard that as resurrecting a career. I can’t think of anyone who’s done that under Warnock.
    Taarabt signed for Spurs, his career nose dived, Warnock got hold of him and improved him.

    Also, I can't believe I've missed it: Sol Bamba.

  5. #5

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Taarabt signed for Spurs, his career nose dived, Warnock got hold of him and improved him.

    Also, I can't believe I've missed it: Sol Bamba.
    Also Hoilett, while Etheridge and NML have kicked on no end.

  6. #6

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Is he better than what we've got?

  7. #7

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    This is such an odd one, we've got several strikers and this guy's done nothing to suggest he'll knock them in for us. Warnock does do some strange things in the transfer market, been a pretty underwhelming pre season hasn't it

  8. #8

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by delmbox View Post
    Warnock does do some strange things in the transfer market, been a pretty underwhelming pre season hasn't it
    Exactly the same as last season, planning ahead is not one of his strong points.

  9. #9

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    I really just don't understand why Tan & Co can't grow a pair of bollocks and open the chequebook whilst we can? Or is it that they are anticipating some sort of embargo in the future and now won't spend much?

    Show some ambition and players will come. I'm not being funny, Vaulks might turn out to be a gem, but he and Flint are hardly saying to the other teams in the league and potential targets "look at us, we mean business". They're just really safe signings.

  10. #10
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    He's only played 700 minutes of football in the championship, so "23 games" is a big stretch. 7-8 games worth of minutes
    That's even worse.

  11. #11

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    That's even worse.
    How is it worse?

  12. #12
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    How is it worse?
    The poster I was responding to earlier appeared to argue that Vassell wasn't an unproven Championship player. I thought that he'd played 23 games and scored 1 solitary goal. You've now informed me that he's only played about 7-8 games worth of minutes in the division, which is far worse than I'd realised.

  13. #13

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    The poster I was responding to earlier appeared to argue that Vassell wasn't an unproven Championship player. I thought that he'd played 23 games and scored 1 solitary goal. You've now informed me that he's only played about 7-8 games worth of minutes in the division, which is far worse than I'd realised.
    it bumps his goals to games ratio up though

  14. #14

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    The poster I was responding to earlier appeared to argue that Vassell wasn't an unproven Championship player. I thought that he'd played 23 games and scored 1 solitary goal. You've now informed me that he's only played about 7-8 games worth of minutes in the division, which is far worse than I'd realised.
    Yeah but we should buy him instead of a centre mid because we've only got Glatzel, Ward, Madine and Bogle competing for one position, while we've got Bacuna, Ralls and Vaulks for 2.

  15. #15

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    The poster I was responding to earlier appeared to argue that Vassell wasn't an unproven Championship player. I thought that he'd played 23 games and scored 1 solitary goal. You've now informed me that he's only played about 7-8 games worth of minutes in the division, which is far worse than I'd realised.
    I would argue that it means he's unproven, especially given the disruption of his injuries.
    If he had played 23 games and scored 1 goal then it would be fairly damning evidence that he wasn't up to it at this level.

  16. #16
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by delmbox View Post
    it bumps his goals to games ratio up though
    True dat.

    Where's Not Eddie May these days? He loved a good G2G ratio.

  17. #17

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Soul '68 View Post
    It should take you to a review of the Pompey v Brum EFL game from last night, where it mentions Vassell wasn't in Brums line up last night because he is on his way to another club, which looks like being Cardiff City. The link works fine for me...
    Hats why I asked as that’s what normally happens and it goes via the app, but it didn’t for me so I did it myself.

  18. #18

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    Also Hoilett, while Etheridge and NML have kicked on no end.
    Warnock took NML and Etheridge from league 1 and made them Premier league players

  19. #19
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    I would argue that it means he's unproven, especially given the disruption of his injuries.
    If he had played 23 games and scored 1 goal then it would be fairly damning evidence that he wasn't up to it at this level.
    He's literally unproven. I'm not commenting on his ability, potential or being critical of him in any way. It's just a fact that he's unproven as he's not played anywhere near close to enough games in the division.

  20. #20

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    He's literally unproven. I'm not commenting on his ability, potential or being critical of him in any way. It's just a fact that he's unproven as he's not played anywhere near close to enough games in the division.
    I'd agree he's unproven, but for me that's better than having been proven to be not good enough. Presumably our scouts have seen something in him they like

  21. #21
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    I'd agree he's unproven, but for me that's better than having been proven to be not good enough. Presumably our scouts have seen something in him they like
    Agreed.

  22. #22

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Heisenberg View Post
    Agreed.
    Not sure if our scouts know what a striker is though

  23. #23

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    Iour scouts have seen something in him they like

  24. #24

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by delmbox View Post
    our scouts

  25. #25
    Heisenberg
    Guest

    Re: Isaac Vassell

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    I'd agree he's unproven, but for me that's better than having been proven to be not good enough.
    It just occurred to me that we shouldn't be in a position where we are looking at unproven or proven to not be good enough players at this level. We've just been relegated from the Premier League. If we can't attract/are not looking to sign proven Championship strikers as a bare minimum, then there's something seriously wrong at the club.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •