+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Nonsense. If a tactic isn't working, the manager and team must adapt. That's what game management is. Good managers react and change formations and tactics based on what they see happening in front of them. You think Klopp and Guardiola send their teams out with just one plan?
Personally for that reason I genuinely thought the premier league was quite boring. Every team we played seemed to be strong, tall, quick, skilful, well organised- and didn’t have any weak links.
In the championship all teams and players have some strengths but they also have weaknesses so its always game on. A real contrast of tactics available. Much more interesting.
He plays to our strengths, but sometimes it only takes a second to look up, if you’re gonna hoof it hoof it near someone so we can at least make a challenge and attempt to keep the ball.
One thing that’s always grated on me
Is aimless punts upfield. Other teams do, liverpool and Man City for example resort to it, but it’s always calculated. I honestly believe we just don’t look and welly the ball at times.
Off top of my head defended deeper against us for a start and stretched the pitc as realised we were hopeless being given time on the ball.
Also more focus on stopping the ball going wide early.
Also the early wins relied heavily on zohore getting in behind and running the channels. Once he stopped doing that and stopped being effective the whole thing had to change. We needed him and we looked best when he played well.
A bit like bothroyd under Dave jones- but when we didn’t have bothroyd Jones teams tried to play the same way and it just didn’t happen. Warnock is quite set in his ways yes- but he’s also clever enough to adapt. Which is how we still went up.
I asked because it’s also been suggested we actually abandoned the style somewhat for a more conservative approach so interesting to read different viewpoints. I also felt we ran out of steam a bit as the season progressed and found the tempo difficult to maintain. Perhaps as always it’s a bit of a combination of factors.
Not a great spectacle yesterday but I think some of that can be put down to players bedding in and the way Luton set up to play.
As for trying to pass through teams, retain possession and thus make it a better spectacle as many are advocating, the players required to do this cost money. They also have big egos.
As it seems for all the world that VT isn't throwing money about, we do the next best thing, get a man in who can compete and get the best from a bunch of "limited" players.
He knops exactly what he is doing, and he dosent know how to do anything else. And he does it for himself, not the club. If he did, his signings would be of a different caliber and age. And you could see a team capable of a transition in the future. You can’t do that now, it’s even more “Warwick ball” than it’s ever been. And please stop with the budget, paying millions bullshit. There are a million different types of players out there. In all shapes and colors. He does this for himself.
Not allowing the opposition to set up to defend one tactic would be nice.
However, it is interesting to see which sides are passing the ball the most this season and specifically that we're only 10 successful passes behind Fulham: https://twitter.com/Champstat/status...67242464055296
Most successful passes this season
West Brom - 908
Leeds - 897
Brentford - 886
Swansea - 740
Derby - 709
Fewest successful passes
Millwall - 260
Hull - 269
Cardiff - 308
Fulham - 318
Blackburn - 355
You know exactly what you get with Warwick. And it’s not suitable for the club potential. It might be for a team like Luton. But not Cardiff. How many was at the game yesterday? And just like that, I keep a higher standard than Jordan..
Ask yourself, what is he trying to achieve? What would be the point of going up? We have no players capable of stepping up. Didn’t sign anyone for the future. And we all know what would happen if we did. Still sign players on a shoestring budget.
Lots of clubs do that. But they are slowly building something, or at least trying to. For me, get Warwick on the bus. And take Dalman and that little fella with him..
Agree with all this, we give the ball away far too easily and that puts us under massive pressure.
The possession stat is counted passes rather than time on the ball so I think it’s a little skewed because of how we play.
But there’s no hiding the fact that we are terrible at keeping the ball and passing the ball.
I wouldn’t want to see us constantly passing it around the back but when we are 1-0 up I’d rather us do that than keep giving it away.
Some good posts in this thread and it's great to see the level of debate has taken a step upward curve lately.
Though I may not be as harsh as wolf mother (sometimes) I'm generally in his camp in how we view the game.
I do feel Warnock had a responsibility to keep one eye on the next incoming manager and to assist the club in that transition. The board also had the same responsibility.
I believe there's a reason Flint was signed by Pulis and then Warnock. I'm not disputing that Flint is not good at what he does but a more mobile, younger replacement like Nelson would have been a better long term replacement.
I don't think we'll have a choice whether we want to evolve into the modern game. Players like Peltier etc are dying species and even if we had an academy like Ajax they could never be used in the way our manager would want them to be used.
Kids are taught differently today and are 10 times more technical than they were when I was a kid.
It affects us when we are trying to develop our own, it affects us in the loan market and affects us when attracting players.
the top completed passers in the opposition half yesterday were
Ralls 16/24
Pack 13/20
Tunnicliffe 13/23
We pass the ball in the areas where it hurts teams , not around our own box.