Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
I think over the course of the three and a half matches so far, Australia have shown themselves to be a much stronger team than England who have had to rely on inspired individual contributions to stay in contention. I know that the biggest individual contribution of the lot has come from Steve Smith,but, although not great, I would say Australia's other specialist batsmen have been better than England's, only Broad out of the home bowlers has been consistently good (Archer has been very good at times, but he has got progressively slower after being given a very heavy workload at Edgbaston for a player who has played so little red ball cricket in his career) and Australia have a lot more depth to their attack.
Today looks like being an on and off type of day with showers forecast, but the weekend looks set fare and it'll require England's best batting as a team of the series to save the game - the evidence so far says they won't be up to it.