+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 25 of 293

Thread: Ukraine Corruption

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: Ukraine Corruption

    Quote Originally Posted by life on mars View Post
    You could argue that the Impeachment investigation is as corrupt or biased process as is the actual trial by the Senate.

    Both processes are weighted to either political party that holds a majority , which makes any impeachment a mockery and allows it to become just a political driven agenda , with no independent judge and jury , but grabbing useful, desperate media headlines .

    Thankfully for the Democrats their dreams can come true , as they will have the chance to put this case to a real judge and jury ( the many millions, of American voters .)

    I feel another wait and see moment appearing .
    You're right there. You have to be suspicious of a 'trial' where more than half the jurors have said they have made their minds up already and refuse to listen to witnesses and refuse to see new evidence.

  2. #2

    Re: Ukraine Corruption

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    You're right there. You have to be suspicious of a 'trial' where more than half the jurors have said they have made their minds up already and refuse to listen to witnesses and refuse to see new evidence.
    Have they found the whistleblower yet? They should be witness No.1, followed by Chairman Schiff.

  3. #3

    Re: Ukraine Corruption

    Quote Originally Posted by lardy View Post
    You're right there. You have to be suspicious of a 'trial' where more than half the jurors have said they have made their minds up already and refuse to listen to witnesses and refuse to see new evidence.
    what I dont, get why bring new evidence to the for now ,surely they had it already , it cant just have popped out of nowhere, of course witnesses should be allowed, including the whistle blower ,where is he/she , who is he /she , surely they have to collaborate and anything as important as this , need the hard facts no hearsay ??

    Apparently the whistleblower admitted that they were “not a direct witness to most of the events described,” but were rather “informed” of these various facts by “more than half a dozen U.S. officials” in the course of their work , that is a bit weak , any lawyer would shoot that down ???

    There's crap on both sides flying around if you ask me .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •