Originally Posted by
Loramski
Pardon my tardiness, I meant to agree with you here days ago and didn't get round to it. I take Tuerto's point in this thread but if Coxe had been that much of a liability then half time would've been when to take him off. Having kept him on he grew into the game, made a great defensive block and, as you say, started to make an impression going forward.
Whyte had tucked in a bit on our side, I think Murphy did on yours too, to free up the wide channel for the full back. This set up is absolutely made for Coxe, he'll run up and down the touchline all day. It made no sense to take him off (unless he was tiring, which he didn't seem to be), it was a system that suited him.
For me, Tomlin should've come on for Paterson and him, Whyte, Murphy and Glatzel given 20 minutes to unpick the defence while the full backs gave the width. Bacuna didn't add anything out wide, he'd have been better off staying in centre mid where Tomlin was ineffectual. We got counter attacked more after the substitutions and could easily have lost. Regardless of the mistakes Coxe had made in the first half, subbing him at that time seemed pointless.