| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Praise the government. 😂😂😂😂
Praise where it's deserved, criticism where it's deserved. Can't do one without the other if you're an impartial group.Originally Posted by Rjk
The alternative group cannot claim to be independent given it's composition. It's nowhere near the size of the SAGE group either.
Not at all. I can see why the point flies over your head though.
Are you on your period or something? I quoted exactly what you said on the last page.
It's an unfortunate situation but yes people will have to go to work and not be able to go for a pint for a while. I apologise but I can't read all of this wall of text but it appears to be a mad rant anyway.
They can't take the risk because it isn't just a risk for them it's a risk for everyone.
Sounds like you'd prefer to live in North Korea.
Why would anyone praise he curren government?!
Nice myogynism there.
I'd have thought an independent group would praise things done right in their view, condemn things done wrong in their view.
No you wouldn't.
Nice spelling there.
It's as bad as misopia in my opinion
As usual you decend to personal insults. It's to be expected with some on here.
It isn't a mad rant it is an attempt to explain the point I was trying to make to someone who is actively avoiding it.
I didn't sat it wasn't an unfortunate reality I said people will baulk against it, (and this country is run by consent).
Going to work is not just a risk for them either, its a risk for reveryone who is in work with them.
What makes you think going to work won't be a risk but doing something you want to do will be a risk?
Now that is stupid. and myopic.
(Sorry cyclops)
Yeah I would.
been coughed on lately? I get the feeling there would be a large queue.
The largeness is only exagerrated further by everyone being 2m apart.
Where is there a personal insult there?As usual you decend to personal insults. It's to be expected with some on here.
It isn't a mad rant it is an attempt to explain the point I was trying to make to someone who is actively avoiding it.
I didn't sat it wasn't an unfortunate reality I said people will baulk against it, (and this country is run by consent).
Going to work is not just a risk for them either, its a risk for reveryone who is in work with them.
What makes you think going to work won't be a risk but doing something you want to do will be a risk?
Now that is stupid. and myopic.
(Sorry cyclops
Yes but risks can be minimised in work and unfortunately working and keeping the economy going a bit is slightly more important than going for a pint no matter how much we all want one.
Look at the restrictions being relaxed anywhere else, unfortunately pubs will be the last thing to come back and it's for a good reason.
They aren't there to critique the government response though are they? Just to give more transparent expert interpretation of the data
Where is the personal insult? do you really think that that comment is not personal insulting sexist and derogartory? If that is the case then there is something seriously wrong with you.
It suggests that when a woman is "on her period" she is not capable of rational thought, it implies I am not a man and it is deeply insulting to all women.
But hey, its not a personal, insult, it's an insult to every woman on the planet.
But are you on it though?
you pretend to be so righteous but when it come down to it you really are an asshole aren't you?
Safe there hiding behind your keyboard.
You're a waste of oxygen!
I'll take that as a yes
As far as I can see, you've spent several messages saying why you don't think they're worth listening to without responding to the quote that came out of the meeting, in fact you'd rather find a tweet from 2012 to share. If they do ever "praise the government" I think it's unlikely that you'll be listening to find out.
That's something I recognise those too settled on one side of the political debate would do, be that side left or right.
We know that PPE guidance has changed in England at the same time as stories coming out regarding issues of supply. "The science" won't have changed for that finite period of time but government response to it will while still saying "at all times we've followed the science". We don't know what the science has said previously or is saying now so cannot say how much other actions have simply been because we didn't have capacity/weren't prepared enough to do what science was saying so had to come up with a different interpretation.
This is an Italian MP who recently got his hair off when saying Covid-19 is little more than the flu and the number of COVID-19 deaths have been deliberately inflated to strip away the freedoms of Italians. He says 96.3% of those marked as COVID-19 deaths died of heart attacks or other diseases.
He's known to speak his mind because he's one of only a small number of independent MPs there so has no-one to answer to and no promotions to risk missing out on.
Farage was an MP once. He "spoke his mind" a lot too. I wouldn't have given him any credence had he still been an MP and came up with something like this as... How the f**k would he know what percentage of people dying actually died of Covid-19 or other causes? He wouldn't. Neither does this guy.
The End.
An MP in his dreams
Oops... Should have said MEPAn MP in his dreams
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote