+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    3. Abbandonato suggests (but doesn't provide corroboration) that Cardiff City's insurers also believe that Emiliano Sala was a Nantes player at the time of his death and he was not covered by the club's policy.

    The above suggests that Cardiff City had insured the player. Isn't that new information? While the insurers have taken the view they have that is meaningless if the Courts rule otherwise.

  2. #2

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    Quote Originally Posted by Vindec View Post
    3. Abbandonato suggests (but doesn't provide corroboration) that Cardiff City's insurers also believe that Emiliano Sala was a Nantes player at the time of his death and he was not covered by the club's policy.

    The above suggests that Cardiff City had insured the player. Isn't that new information? While the insurers have taken the view they have that is meaningless if the Courts rule otherwise.
    Insurance companies are rarely wrong in their assessments, risk management is their business and they only employ the best.

  3. #3

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
    Insurance companies are rarely wrong in their assessments, risk management is their business and they only employ the best.
    well when 2 insurance companies take opposing views, one of them is probably wrong

  4. #4

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    Quote Originally Posted by Rjk View Post
    well when 2 insurance companies take opposing views, one of them is probably wrong
    It won't be the insurers who made the mistake.

  5. #5

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    Quote Originally Posted by Vindec View Post
    3. Abbandonato suggests (but doesn't provide corroboration) that Cardiff City's insurers also believe that Emiliano Sala was a Nantes player at the time of his death and he was not covered by the club's policy.

    The above suggests that Cardiff City had insured the player. Isn't that new information? While the insurers have taken the view they have that is meaningless if the Courts rule otherwise.
    How could the club have insured him if as you say the insurers say he was still a Nantes player? They can’t….

  6. #6

    Re: CAS - Cardiff v Nantes

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    How could the club have insured him if as you say the insurers say he was still a Nantes player? They can’t….
    I think both insurers are awaiting the CAS decision on whether Sala was a City player or a Nantes player at the time of the accident. Logic says he was one or the other, and then presumably the relevant club's insurer would pay whatever compensation was underwritten.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •