Quote Originally Posted by RichardM View Post
I wasn't on the jury, I didn't hear anything to make me think he is guilty. I was merely arguing against the point made earlier that it would never have gone to court in the first place if it wasn't Giggs
My view now is that if one jury couldn't reach a verdict why should we expect another to if there is no new evidence? To me it is a waste of time and unfair to have a retrial without fresh evidence.
I get your point, but this was a very well publicised trial so you didn’t need to be on the jury to see the evidence.

I can’t think of what piece of evidence brought that justified this ever getting to court, other than his name.

With the loss of two phones and denial of access to iCloud from her, the evidence was just hearsay, unreliable, and I’m surprised this didn’t get thrown out straight away