| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I'm on the fence with this, and need more information. Here's a different view
On Climate Alarmism & the Net Zero Trap for Globalist Technocracy
have you actually watched all 1 HR 43 minutes of this tosh?
I managed 10 or so minutes, which was generally laughable, but they hadn't got around to the crux of any argument they were trying to make, so can't really comment. could you summarize what their main point is?
Could this not have gone in the other thread (also started by you) entitled “there is no climate emergency” ?
And why aren't all the Armageddon/WEF/Klaus Schwab/You will own nothing/Black-eyed zombie/5g/Magnetic cataclysm/Illuminati/David Icke/Insect meals/Monkey Pox conspiracy/Clotshot threads not amalgamated?Originally Posted by delmbox
This is specifically about the implementation of a globalist technocracy. If you don't care about it then just ignore it.
I'd be interested in this topic if my hobby was galivanting around the world.
so have you watched the whole video?
You probably want to form your own opinion on this, so you are absolutely sure about it when your rights and freedoms start getting removed. For the record, I am still undecided due to the complexity of the subject, but I did find it interesting that the covid lockdowns (and subsequent financial crisis) were caused by the inaccurate modelling of an expert, who then went on to ignore his own advice. Of course, you are free to ignore any and all information if you don't think science should be questioned, or challenged by a competing hypothesis.
so you've seen the first 5 minutes like me?
Refer to the previous comment.
Just put it on.
What bit are you on the fence about?
Are you saying that they're all part of the same thing......? What do you know...
All of it, because I have never really looked into it before, and I always examine both sides of a story. I also think it needs to be viewed with fresh eyes after the the Covid "trust the science" experts got so much wrong, and there are parallels with the censorship and propaganda surrounding both of these topics, to the extent that I am getting a slight feeling of deja vu. Finally, the costs of getting it wrong this time around will be catastrophic, both financially and from a personal liberties perspective.
Pretty sure we have talked about the UN Agenda 21/30 in the past.
Possibly, and now the A Team is running the country.
BTW were the emergency powers introduced by Boris ever lifted?
Great clip of Carl Sagan in that vid, loved his book Demon Haunted World.
I can't remember who it was but someone on here told me to read it to cure me of conspiracies.
Climate change activist Izzy Cook tells everyone not to travel to places like Fiji by plane to save the planet and then is asked where she flew last… she flew to Fiji.
— ☢️🇺🇸 KC 3.0 🇺🇸☢️ (@KCPayTreeIt) September 27, 2022
Interviewer can’t stop laughing at her 🤣🤣 pic.twitter.com/cTZqvVgkFI
They're all separate topics.
Besides, it's not as much fun or craziness if you squash it all into one thread old fruit
This is an idiotic, attention-seeking pile of crap. I can't believe there are gullible fools who actually believe this cobblers.
Such a big brave presenter setting what was a pretty obvious trap for a sixteen year old - it takes a certain type of person to laugh from the sidelines at youngsters who want to do something to put right the wrongs committed by the generation that presenter belongs to. Funnily enough, I just Googled that presenter's name and, apart from a short biographical piece from her radio station, the only thing that came up were reaction pieces to her laughing at a teenager who cares more about the world than she does.Climate change activist Izzy Cook tells everyone not to travel to places like Fiji by plane to save the planet and then is asked where she flew last… she flew to Fiji.
— ☢️���� KC 3.0 ����☢️ (@KCPayTreeIt) September 27, 2022
Interviewer can’t stop laughing at her ���� pic.twitter.com/cTZqvVgkFI
https://www.news.com.au/technology/e...1fe87e5f5f83a1
Can anyone who thinks it isn't real explain the physical process that scientists believe is causing man made climate change?
What part of the physical process do you disagree with?
It's always the hypocrites who tell everybody what to do, same as the billionaires who crisscross the globe in their fleets of private jets, while telling everybody else they shouldn't be flying anymore. I remember watching a documentary with the new king, and he receives a delivery of hundreds of the finest Italian Parma hams every year, and in the next breath he is telling you not to eat meat to save the planet. As a relative nobody, you shouldn't be standing up for your oppressors. Why must you live a shitty life, when they don't.
So, this sixteen year old is oppressing me?
Every hypocrite is not only oppressing you, but they are also laughing at you. The world is supposedly going to be underwater soon due to global warming, yet the billionaires are buying up huge seafront mansions all over the place. What do they know that we don't know?
That the areas with huge seafront mansions are probably more equipped to deal with rising sea levels. Half of the Netherlands is below sea levels but as an advanced, wealthy, first world nation they have the resources to cope with current sea levels and future rising ones.
Now Bangladesh on the other hand, 3/4 of which is below sea level. Rising sea levels will make it harder and more expensive to build and maintain adequate flood defences. If they fail or simply can’t create the appropriate defences then 150million people need to find somewhere new to live.
I thought you said you were doing some in-depth research on this? Why are you being silly acting like the sea is going to rise 100 metres?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
