+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 206

Thread: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

  1. #126

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by NYCBlue View Post
    Decent result, but we could have won.
    Should

  2. #127

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    Happy with the 2nd half. Etete did well, wanted the ball, romeo much better, Glad ralls was taken off, he hurts my eyes.
    I'm not a Ralls fan. He treats the ball like a hot potato,

  3. #128

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    Draws are not really going to pull us away from the relegation zone . Some city fans still say to me we are too good to go down 👇 I am amazed by that opinion , I would say there are 6 or 7 sides in the pit and we are one of them
    I dont know any City fans who say we are too good to go down.

  4. #129

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Rock_Flock_of_Five View Post
    I'm not a Ralls fan. He treats the ball like a hot potato,
    He's alright, but sometimes he's a hindrance in my opinion because he is so slow on the ball, and he's even slower now! i appreciate what he had done, but i've never really been that enthused over his ability.

  5. #130

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    I dont know any City fans who say we are too good to go down.
    Neither does sludge!

  6. #131

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    I think we have the potential to improve over the second half of the season. A few glaring weaknesses, which at least enables things to be put right.

  7. #132

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    He's alright, but sometimes he's a hindrance in my opinion because he is so slow on the ball, and he's even slower now! i appreciate what he had done, but i've never really been that enthused over his ability.
    Ralls gets a bad injury ruling him out for a significant period and we are down in my opi ion.

  8. #133

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    Neither does sludge!
    🤣🤣🤣

  9. #134

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Ralls gets a bad injury ruling him out for a significant period and we are down in my opi ion.
    You think he's that influential?

  10. #135

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by A Quiet Monkfish View Post
    I think we have the potential to improve over the second half of the season. A few glaring weaknesses, which at least enables things to be put right.
    yes you'd have thought we'd likely be better in the second half of the season after we brought in so many new players

  11. #136

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    You think he's that influential?
    I certainly don't and agree with what you have said. He is neat and tidy in appearance and does a lot of pointing in a Jordan Henderson manner, but he doesn't measure up to Joe Ledley say. He may bring a certain calm but I really don't think he influences games. Often it is said that you appreciate certain players when they are missing but I have never felt this with Ralls. Great servant but why is that? Is it because nobody else took a real interest at this level? Quite how Ralls gets the praise he does in comparison to Mark Harris has always baffled me.

  12. #137

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread


  13. #138

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    You think he's that influential?
    I think we are a really poor team. I think hes an old 28 year old due to the way hes played.

    We are in a huge battle. We need Ralls even if his best days are gone.

  14. #139

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    I dont know any City fans who say we are too good to go down.
    You may not but I ****ing do

    On here we can be a moribund bunch but I think recently we are about right

  15. #140

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    You may not but I ****ing do

    On here we can be a moribund bunch but I think recently we are about right
    Fair enough. Everyone I know say we are shit.

  16. #141

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Bosch View Post
    I certainly don't and agree with what you have said. He is neat and tidy in appearance and does a lot of pointing in a Jordan Henderson manner, but he doesn't measure up to Joe Ledley say. He may bring a certain calm but I really don't think he influences games. Often it is said that you appreciate certain players when they are missing but I have never felt this with Ralls. Great servant but why is that? Is it because nobody else took a real interest at this level? Quite how Ralls gets the praise he does in comparison to Mark Harris has always baffled me.
    Ralls is a good workhorse

    If he chipped in with 12 goals a season people would be wanting to take him home to shag their sister

  17. #142

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Fair enough. Everyone I know say we are shit.
    Didn’t you say Iran were sh*t too before Wales played them? Or have I got you mixed up…..

  18. #143

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    Ralls is a good workhorse

    If he chipped in with 12 goals a season people would be wanting to take him home to shag their sister
    But he doesn't. If my aunty had a cock she'd be my uncle etc.

  19. #144

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Bosch View Post
    But he doesn't. If my aunty had a cock she'd be my uncle etc.
    Bollocks


    If my aunty had bollocks .....

  20. #145

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    Didn’t you say Iran were sh*t too before Wales played them? Or have I got you mixed up…..
    No you are right , he's mixed up

  21. #146

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Harry Bosch View Post
    But he doesn't. If my aunty had a cock she'd be my uncle etc.
    Bit old fashioned - I think you’ll find in this day and age many peoples aunties have cocks.

  22. #147

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Fair enough. Everyone I know say we are shit.
    Same.

  23. #148

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuerto View Post
    Same.
    What a surprise

  24. #149

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by goats View Post
    Didn’t you say Iran were sh*t too before Wales played them? Or have I got you mixed up…..
    I was one of them for sure.

    I didnt realise how bad we were.

  25. #150

    Re: FT: STOKE CITY 2 - 2 CARDIFF CITY. Match thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    What a surprise
    you think we're shit as well, we are hovering about the relegation zone and the performances haven't been great. And you're surprised that the other City fans i know don't think that we are very good, even though you think that way yourself. **** me!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •