Well,not entirely - only free transfers and loans (with no loan fee paid) this month according to this;-
https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Fo...f+City?type=ln
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
According to WOL
"The EFL rule that if an embargo has been in place for more than 30 days then the club are prohibited from paying a fee for a player for three windows.
As we understand it, the EFL assert the club were notified of the embargo more than 30 days before paying the £7m to Nantes this week and therefore this particular part of the ban has not yet been lifted. Talks, however, are going on behind the scenes in a bid to find a solution.
What it essentially means for the time being is that Cardiff are able to register new players but are unable to pay fees for them for the next three windows."
https://mobile.twitter.com/lee_georg...74535889682434
Well,not entirely - only free transfers and loans (with no loan fee paid) this month according to this;-
https://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Sport/Fo...f+City?type=ln
Possibly, but would we have paid what works out at around £7 million just to sign frees and cheap loans? I’m assuming there that we paid the first instalment because we wanted to bring in players this month, but then you’d think that, if we were always going to pay £7 million, we’d have made sure that we did so within the thirty days.
In / out , shake it all about , lets take the positiveness out of this ..
We may have done so within 30 days, as the WO article hinges on one line "As we understand it".
I wouldn't put too much hope on anything that WO understand.
Either way, i'd be confident that we'd be able to appeal this particular clause given the unique scenario that led to the delayed payment
Sorry, here’s the story I was referring to.
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/...ually-25956639
I guess for example, we could loan a player from Kortrijk if they were to sign someone first
Wonder if it applies to compensation for out of contact young players too.
Wot a shambles. I wonder if Vinny kept the receipt.
I think there’s still room for some “creative” deals - for example, the Gareth Ainsworth type whereby we took over the contract of a player who did not have long left on his deal and was not going to sign a new one. That could be reported as a free transfer with the “fee” being the money a club makes by no longer having to pay his wages.
At long as we get McGuiness back I'm fine with it
Do you think we were going to Pay 7million and then have money left over to buy players?
I always assumed this window would be loans and maybe frees who have their contract terminated as part of the agreement when we sign them. I don't think we improve upon what we've got without spending north of 2 million per player, i just don't think we have that sort money, especially now.
PFree doesn’t mean free though, the better the player, the higher the wages/signing on fee etc, so money will be needed, it’s not a food bank. Warnock was lauded for his ‘free, out of contract’ signings, those players may well have cost more than players we paid a fee for in the long run.