| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
For reason's I've been unable to discern he's viewed as Blighty's potential saviour by fans of Parliament's Red Team who, despite all evidence to the contrary, remain convinced is fundamentally different to Parliament's Blue Team, but tellingly are never able to articulate what fundamental differences exist between them.
The Red Team's hero busied himself at the WEF's gathering at Davos last week.
WEF, for those unaware, is that organisation whose Great Reset plans call for most of humanity to own nothing by the year 2030 and to sustain themselves on a diet of bugs, etc.
In this clip rather than bemoan what WEF's stated aims are he complains about the absence of Rishi Sunak, leader of the Blue Team. Presumably, he wanted Sunak to help endorse WEF's nefarious agenda by attending.
For any Tories hereabout who may be concerned that Sunak's absence at Davos may signal he doesn't have identical views to Starmer, fear not because he certainly does.
Cop26: Sunak pledges to 'rewire' global finance system for net zero - https://www.gov.uk/government/news/c...nancial-centre
Sir Kier of the Tory Lite should now storm into power .
Love all the Left folk who under Corbyn did not have a good word to say about this type of socialism , The Blair Project , The Guardian ,Jews , now they salivate over the coming of the new son of God Lord Blair in the guise of his son Sir JC Kier
Such fun
So many people cling to the belief that by placing an X for a candidate wearing a different coloured rosette to every other candidate at a General Election poll they can help to vote themselves something better and different to what the others represent.
When in fact it makes no difference what choice they make because every vote they cast is for the same Uniparty who implement the policies dictated to them by those who occupy one square-mile down the road in the City of London, which is Britain's state within a state, and is home to where the real power resides: mega banks and other giant corporations that work the strings of the politicians.
The late George Carlin nailed it perfectly in under three minutes.
Organ is spot on his organ
Carlin is right Critical Thinking is not needed in life including on this board if you have a different view ..
Sir Kier was with the this lot a long ago as was Epstein , Gates ,Clintons etc etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_zy9THSz1c
Paul Knaggs, editor of Labour Heartlands, speaks about Keir Starmer's 'Mr Ben' personality, his desire to be seen as working class and how his membership of the Trilateral Commission will win him no favours in the Red Wall.
Michael Knox:
I am in the middle of reading Oliver Eagleton's book, "The Starmer Project - A Journey to the Right." Helen Wainwright describes the book as a gripping account of a human rights lawyer with an insatiable need to ingratiate himself with established authority. It's a must read for the left in the LP.
The 'secret ballot' at elections is also a complete myth. Nevertheless, it doesn't preclude those who partake in them from repeating what's patently untrue.
I know folk who can't spell X and they still vote??
Was that a question?Originally Posted by life on mars
Were you looking in the mirror at the timeYou're the last person who should criticise other people's spelling
i see liz truss having her say about the new world order speaking in Tokyo
no wonder the dark forces kicked her out pretty sharpish
Liz Truss confirms that 'authoritarian regimes' are trying to create 'a new world order' pic.twitter.com/8ROSZk5zBr
— �������� ������������ (@Alex_new22) February 19, 2023
Cheers, Liz. I've been telling our Teletubbies that for yonks.
whilst the BRICS nations go on from strength to strength organ
Mozzer, please consider that the 'R' (in particular) from that acronym is one of the "authoritarian regimes" that she was referring to. Also consider spending less time in the crazy parts of Twitter.
The dark forces got rid of her but there she is, globally grassing them up without a care in the world. Think about that for a second.
Someone I know did their bar exams in law with Sir Keir Starma - his opinion was this - probably the most boring man ever to grace a court room, zero personality, defunct of original thought and not a person you would want to have a pint with or be defending you in a case. Never met the man myself - he comes across as a manager rather than a leader though, doesnt exactly hold the room when talking.
Your "mate" isn't Ronnie is it? He said he was really successful in the legal profession.
Ha ha, there's a blast from the past
And what's your 'mate' doing now? Did he ever reach the heights of Director of Public Prosecutions and Leader of the Opposition?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64729442
https://institute.global/policy/new-...future-britain
Like any politician, Starmer has strengths and weaknesses and I don't think anyone would cite charisma as a particular strength. However, he does - I think - exude confidence and competence and those perhaps more boring traits are what people want after a fairly wild few years?
That said, Sunak is pretty boring and uninspiring too, so even if his lack of charisma is a weakness for Starmer he won't be scored down on it as the main opponent is hardly better
I don't disagree with any of this to be honest. But, even though I'm not a big fan of Starmer whether you would want a pint with a person should be about 50th priority in determining our prime minister.
I dislike Johnson as a PM but if I bumped into him at a pub before his political career than I'd probably enjoy a pint with him.
If he was any good they wouldn't allow him to become PM
Do you seriously think Johnson would have a pint with the likes of you or me?!!
Give me a pint with Starmer any day. Far more interesting, you could talk football and he'd buy you a pint back - Johnson's a notorious tight-arse and never puts his hand in his pocket.
Nope I don't think he would. But it's a hypothetical situation and if I had the choice of Starmer or Johnson it would be Johnson. I don't think Starmer has told a joke in his life
Perhaps you're right but it could all be part of a carefully constructed public persona of staid dependability. Starmer might be a raving nutcase behind closed doors.
And as Claude said Johnson would probably ditch his public persona and tell the likes of you and me to f**k off, unless there were votes or rolls of gold wallpaper in it for him
A lot of folk either side of political divide say the same about Boris , even after his political career . I feel he'd give you time to chat and not be aloof , he seems to like social interaction. He is a character.
Same for Farage and Clarkson, they love pub life pint and a rant , they may talk some bollocks but I find they also talk sense .
You don’t have to avoid the opposite of your beliefs, those who do enage are better people in my humble view, even if the conversation turns sour ,its about having the conversations, then the rant or sharing of views that makes for a healthy diverse society .
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote