+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 63

Thread: Labour under Starmer.

  1. #26

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by life on mars View Post
    Excellent summary and spot on , your views are the same for millions of centralist, who fell out of love with Labour and struggle with Tories, I with you on Mordant she has that leadership look , as I was with the excellent Ruth Davidson.. to be fair the Tories have more respect for women than Labour in both leadership and not having a penis.
    Well you are certainly not centralist

    The Tories are the party for backstabbers

    Survival of the fittest etc etc

  2. #27

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Do that you may as well vote Tory.
    I belive voting for Starmer is voting tory.

  3. #28

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Keyser Soze View Post
    The only decent person left in the Conservative party is Penny Mordaunt who seems a lovely person. Modern, fair to people, cares for those who served in the armed forces, a good speaker, funny, bright, personable, balanced and would make a thoroughly good Prime Minister. Excellent presented and debater, and put the SNP’s Angus Robertson and Angela Rayner smack bang, back in their seats in recent debates. The Conservative Party tucked Mordaunt up in the leadership votes and stacked it in favour of a Sunak-Truss vote-off, when polling clearly showed three big things:

    1. She would hammer Starmer in an election
    2. She was most popular with grassroots members
    3. She was hugely popular v Sunak, Truss or Starmer in popularity stakes

    A weird move. Mordaunt would walked an election victory. But the hedge funds have financed both Sunak and Truss wouldn’t back Mordaunt, so the party lobbying worked, and the hedgies financing it all made sure the party got Truss-Sunak in the final. Now they pay the price for their stupidity.
    I don't disagree with the idea that the leadership election (both, if the second one counts) were complete set ups but I think saying she would have 'walked an election' when she would have been inheriting a party 8-10% behind in the polls with all the macro issues facing truss/sunak still in play is an extreme reach.

    As for her polling, well fullfact struggled to decipher her claims but clearly her messaging about being wonderfully popular got across.

    https://fullfact.org/news/penny-mord...armer-polling/

  4. #29

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    There is no mystery.

    Starmer lied - and lied and lied and lied - then he didn’t. The real right wing, adenoidal, personality deficient, cowardly Starmer is the one you see on your TV screens now.

    Despite the Labour shit show on offer they are still a marginally better option than the Tories.

    Depressing isn’t it?
    That's about the size of it although I draw the line at actually voting for him. As the saying goes, you'll only encourage him.

  5. #30

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Yes, depressing. There are good reasons for this recent phenomenon of ineffective leaders, a strong view that I have personally held since the financial crisis.

    Looking at what has happened since then, and looking forward, I see no reason for it to change for anothet five years at least.

  6. #31

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Keyser Soze View Post
    Yes, depressing. There are good reasons for this recent phenomenon of ineffective leaders, a strong view that I have personally held since the financial crisis.

    Looking at what has happened since then, and looking forward, I see no reason for it to change for anothet five years at least.
    yes very depressing what ever your standpoint in politics

    to me the quicker we can get rid of the WEF the better if the western world doesn't want to live like China

    come on join me over here


  7. #32

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robin Friday's Ghost View Post
    That's about the size of it although I draw the line at actually voting for him. As the saying goes, you'll only encourage him.
    So who are you going to vote for then ?

  8. #33

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    So who are you going to vote for then ?
    I genuinely have no idea. I previously lived in Blaenau Gwent and we had a couple of (genuinely) independent candidates who actually got in such was the dissatisfaction with the local Labour Party. I also voted Plaid last time even though I don't like them because the candidate was excellent. I'm in mid Wales now where it's a battle between the Tories and Lib-Dems. I can't vote for either, the former for obvious reasons and the latter because of their despicable turn of face over tuition fees when they joined the coalition.

    So I've no idea.

  9. #34

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robin Friday's Ghost View Post
    I genuinely have no idea. I previously lived in Blaenau Gwent and we had a couple of (genuinely) independent candidates who actually got in such was the dissatisfaction with the local Labour Party. I also voted Plaid last time even though I don't like them because the candidate was excellent. I'm in mid Wales now where it's a battle between the Tories and Lib-Dems. I can't vote for either, the former for obvious reasons and the latter because of their despicable turn of face over tuition fees when they joined the coalition.

    So I've no idea.
    I think if I were you I'd vote for the party I hate least and hopefully that's not the Tories in your case. If the result depended on one vote you'd no doubt kick yourself if the party you hated most won.

  10. #35

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dorcus View Post
    I think if I were you I'd vote for the party I hate least and hopefully that's not the Tories in your case. If the result depended on one vote you'd no doubt kick yourself if the party you hated most won.
    I understand that's how it works for a lot of people but not me. I want to vote for positive reasons and i don't see much of that in today's Labour party. If the Tories get back in then they get back in. I won't be breaking open a bottle if Labour gets in either.

  11. #36

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robin Friday's Ghost View Post
    I understand that's how it works for a lot of people but not me. I want to vote for positive reasons and i don't see much of that in today's Labour party. If the Tories get back in then they get back in. I won't be breaking open a bottle if Labour gets in either.
    They are more likely to get in if moderate voters like you don't bother voting or don't vote Labour because they are not a lot better than the tories

    A Labour led coalition is going to do more than Labour in opposition and yet another tory government

    Starmer is hopeless and the likes of Raynor and the trendy left make me cringe but it's the best of a bad bunch really

    We can't just sit there because if we do then we can't complain

  12. #37

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    They are more likely to get in if moderate voters like you don't bother voting or don't vote Labour because they are not a lot better than the tories

    A Labour led coalition is going to do more than Labour in opposition and yet another tory government

    Starmer is hopeless and the likes of Raynor and the trendy left make me cringe but it's the best of a bad bunch really

    We can't just sit there because if we do then we can't complain
    I agree that's a fair possibility. I am just not willing to give my endorsement to a shower like Labour, and Starmer particularly. He has made it clear that he won't be making any radical changes. He'd be less corrupt I'l give him that. But, other than that, I'm not convinced we'd see much difference.

    I won't complain if I don't vote Labour - which I won't - and the Tories get in again. I'll wait until Labour can offer something I actually support. I understand what you are saying. I just can't go along with it and I'm willing to suffer the consequences. Maybe it will lead to a better Labour Party in the long run. Maybe it won't.

  13. #38

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    I've asked this before but never got much of an answer, but aside from the general benefits of a change of govt that does typically rejuvenate most democracies (and would do in Cardiff Bay and Westminster) what do people think will really change under Labour?

    What are the big ticket improvements to look forward to? Or are they more about the tone of govvernment etc? Which is a reason in itself, but doesn't impact on most people's lives much.

    I can't get enthusiastic about any of them really.

  14. #39

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    I've asked this before but never got much of an answer, but aside from the general benefits of a change of govt that does typically rejuvenate most democracies (and would do in Cardiff Bay and Westminster) what do people think will really change under Labour?

    What are the big ticket improvements to look forward to? Or are they more about the tone of govvernment etc? Which is a reason in itself, but doesn't impact on most people's lives much.

    I can't get enthusiastic about any of them really.
    There's appears to be a loose acknowledgement that government needs to be involved in the delivery of the basic needs of its citizens. I am clinging to that.

    When it comes to energy, water, education, housing, transport etc. the government shouldn't just be an entity that hands out licenses, it is responsible for people.

    Do I think labour will go as far as we need to go to see real change, probably not but I think more than ever there is a realisation and maybe majority support for the idea that quite a large part of the privatisation of this country has not been good in any way for ordinary people. Does that mean instantly nationalising everything, no.

    I am also looking forward to someone boring being in charge. Rishi could be that but integrity and accountability fizzled away very quickly.

    Labour have got a very tough job on their hands presuming they win a majority (or near as) at the next election.

  15. #40

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    I have an acquaintance who took did his bar exam with Keir (they both passed). Starma went to DPP - the acquaintance went into prosecution and then military court-martial. We have talked Keir Starma many times over a pint and there are 2 things that always come up

    1. He had no personality whatsoever.
    2. He is in no way in any shape or form a Socialist.

  16. #41

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
    There is no mystery.

    Starmer lied - and lied and lied and lied - then he didn’t. The real right wing, adenoidal, personality deficient, cowardly Starmer is the one you see on your TV screens now.

    Despite the Labour shit show on offer they are still a marginally better option than the Tories.

    Depressing isn’t it?
    I actually think he will be worse than anything the Tories leaders had to offer, just look at the so-called lefties who were in charge in Canada, Australia and NZ, they were tyrants.

  17. #42

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    I have an acquaintance who took did his bar exam with Keir (they both passed). Starma went to DPP - the acquaintance went into prosecution and then military court-martial. We have talked Keir Starma many times over a pint and there are 2 things that always come up

    1. He had no personality whatsoever.
    2. He is in no way in any shape or form a Socialist.
    3 . You and your mate are fecking Tories

  18. #43

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    3 . You and your mate are fecking Tories
    Presume you were pissed when you scrawled that ?

  19. #44

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    Presume you were pissed when you scrawled that ?
    I don't drink

    You and your mate

    Raving Tories

  20. #45

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    I don't drink

    You and your mate

    Raving Tories
    Laughing gas ?

  21. #46

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quite glad to hear Sludge doesn't drink tbf

  22. #47

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
    Quite glad to hear Sludge doesn't drink tbf
    If he doesnt drink then I cant think of any other excuse to explain his behaviour - other than he's just filled with hate and self loathing (that will be Thatchers fault obviously)

  23. #48

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by pipster View Post
    If he doesnt drink then I cant think of any other excuse to explain his behaviour - other than he's just filled with hate and self loathing (that will be Thatchers fault obviously)
    I just think the Tories are cnuts and that's the way it is

    I have nothing to do with them in life

    It's like sitting next to someone with BO

    I think Tories are essentially selfish and don't care about society , only themselves . I don't associate with people like that . I know some Tories but they are boring windbags much like JamesWales . I don't like to waste my social time on people who I have absolutely nothing in common with and indeed I really don't like .

    That's the way it is .

  24. #49
    First Team Heathblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Melmac, Aldente Nebula, Andromeda Galaxy
    Posts
    4,808

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Starmer just needs to do a Joe Biden. Stay in the basement say nothing and he'll win. The only way back for the tories is that Starmer and or his crew start promising outlandish undeliverable promises, he could help himself by just confirming he understands what a woman is.

  25. #50

    Re: Labour under Starmer.

    Quote Originally Posted by Heathblue View Post
    Starmer just needs to do a Joe Biden. Stay in the basement say nothing and he'll win. The only way back for the tories is that Starmer and or his crew start promising outlandish undeliverable promises, he could help himself by just confirming he understands what a woman is.
    My hope is that starmer gets in and defeats the filth

    Then dies the next day in a bizarre gardening accident

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •