Originally Posted by
Eric the Half a Bee
For an hour or so I've been showing my 10 year old son a couple of first division games that were live at the time on ITV. Two games chosen - Liverpool vs Arsenal, the title decider from May 1989 and a game from the following November when Villa stuffed Everton 6-2. He's seen me post on here and we thought we'd do a little project where he could write his own post looking at the differences as he sees it between then and now.
To start, Liverpool and Arsenal was that big title decider, one of the biggest games in the history of the league. The Villa - Everton game was of interest as well - Everton would go top if they'd won but Villa finished 2nd that season only 2 seasons after promotion. We're talking about 2 massive games at the time. It's perhaps interesting that I say massive - Sky would certainly have billed the Villa vs Everton game as such for weeks.
My boy thought it was strange that ITV allowed just a couple of minutes with a pundit before going straight to the commentary box for the team line ups and kick off. The Liverpool vs Arsenal fixture included some highlights of their previous meetings that season as the kick off was delayed by 10 minutes and no doubt was hastily shoved in as nothing else was prepared.
His first thought was that passing the ball back to the goalkeeper was boring. It seemed to be the way to kick off each half - 3-4 passes going back to the keeper, who picks it up and leathers the ball as far downfield as he can. In fact, Liverpool apart, it seemed the norm for keepers to launch it long whenever they had the ball. That seemed to be the main tactic - get it forward as quickly as possible, hope your forward can get on the end of it, control it and bring others into the game. Villa played with a left winger called Ian Ormondroyd, something like 6'6, and everything from the Villa keeper went straight to him to nod infield.
He thought referees were too relaxed with some of the tackling back then, but preferred it that players just got on with it without surrounding and gesturing to the referee. He doesn't like players diving and thought the game was more honest then. At the end of the Liverpool vs Arsenal game, Barnes has the ball on the right and cuts into the box to put in a cross. Lukic catches it and 3 touches later, Arsenal score. He couldn't believe that Barnes didn't take the ball into the corner.
He was disappointed with the skill levels back then, even with John Barnes. Top players have far more tricks and show off more skills nowadays he reckons. He also prefers that players can pass the ball a lot better now than they did back then and can control it better as well. That might be down to better balls and better pitches.
He liked that football back then was more direct when teams passed the ball inside the opposition half - it had a purpose rather than keeping the ball just for the sake of it, but it often led to the ball being given away. There seemed to be a tendency to put the ball in the box when that wasn't the best option.
He wondered why players back then didn't celebrate wildly when they scored. Quite often a goal was met with a mere handshake. He also thinks crowds were louder back then.