+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 52

Thread: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

  1. #26

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    A good number 9 playing on Saturday would have had 2 or 3 goals with the service being provided now.
    If we went for Moore in January we would be nearer the top six than bottom six come May.
    We have options all over the park, with Bowler and O’Dowda still to come back.
    A number 9 is a priority and an experienced CB as a back up and we have options in every area.

    I’ve been impressed with the keeper and I didn’t think he would step up, but like Tanner he has been keen to grab his opportunity, which has been pleasing to see.

    We still have to shift out some of the deadwood as well, Sawyers, Campbell and Rinhomota etc

    Who are just a drain on resources

  2. #27

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Barring an injury crisis, it looks like Kieffer will be available in January. And if we're in a position financially to get him in, it's an absolute no-brainer.

    I don't care if he forced a move previously, he's the best striker we've had here since Jay Bothroyd. The closest thing you'll get to a guaranteed 15-20 goal-a-season player in this league. And unlike Ugbo and Kaba, he contributes outside the box too.

    In the meantime, the interesting one (for me) is Meite. Unlike other players who've flattered to deceive in the past, he has a strong, proven goalscoring record at this level. It doesn't really tally up with some of the sitters he's been missing. He's capable of absolutely bullying defenders, and if he can start putting away some of these chances I still think he'll come good.

  3. #28

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    Well if etete is not deemed good enough by now he should be moved on

    Grant , Ugbo , Miete , Etete , Robinson

    How many forward players do we need ?
    Not a centre forward, poacher, not a centre forward, 21 and raw, and not a centre forward.

    We could do with a centre forward. Etete is 21. There's still loads of time for him to develop. Gut feeling, he isn't a natural enough goal scorer but I'm certainly not writing him off. He has promise.

  4. #29

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by WJ99mobile View Post
    Kaba was crap but he was in the right place at the right time. He’s better than Ugbo mind
    So he wasn't crap then

  5. #30
    International
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    North Cardiff ha ha
    Posts
    5,328

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    So he wasn't crap then
    Exactly he had a poor touch but knew where the goal was.

  6. #31

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    Well if etete is not deemed good enough by now he should be moved on

    Grant , Ugbo , Miete , Etete , Robinson

    How many forward players do we need ?
    Grant, Miete & Robinson 0 between them

    Ugbo, 2, one every 138 minutes
    Etete 2, one every 93 minutes

    So despite the comments Etete is currently our most effective striker

  7. #32

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by WJ99mobile View Post
    Id like to see Robinson play as the striker despite him being a 10.

    I do not rate Ugbo at all
    I think that's the most sensible approach before going out looking for new blood

  8. #33

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by FormerlyJohnnyBreadhead View Post
    Barring an injury crisis, it looks like Kieffer will be available in January. And if we're in a position financially to get him in, it's an absolute no-brainer.

    I don't care if he forced a move previously, he's the best striker we've had here since Jay Bothroyd. The closest thing you'll get to a guaranteed 15-20 goal-a-season player in this league. And unlike Ugbo and Kaba, he contributes outside the box too.

    In the meantime, the interesting one (for me) is Meite. Unlike other players who've flattered to deceive in the past, he has a strong, proven goalscoring record at this level. It doesn't really tally up with some of the sitters he's been missing. He's capable of absolutely bullying defenders, and if he can start putting away some of these chances I still think he'll come good.
    If we sign Moore then the side will be putting more long balls into our play

    I don't care as long as we score but some on here will have kittens

  9. #34

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    I don't think so

    Robinson will score plenty of goals with a decent service , he's a forward who can put the ball in the net .....if people want to argue his credentials as an out and out striker then whatever

    And with some confidence our current front line is capable

    And there are goals in this team elsewhere from midfield and out wide

    We needed Kaba but I am not sure we need to panic with regard to a fox in the box just yet
    If we're in a strong league position come January I would definitely be looking to sign a decent striker. Look at the impact Frazer Campbell made when he joined us. Could make all the difference if we're pushing for a top 6 finish.

  10. #35

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Des Parrot View Post
    Grant, Miete & Robinson 0 between them

    Ugbo, 2, one every 138 minutes
    Etete 2, one every 93 minutes

    So despite the comments Etete is currently our most effective striker
    Robinson isn't fit and has not started this season

    You can't include him

  11. #36
    International jon1959's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sheffield - out of Roath
    Posts
    16,043

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Des Parrot View Post
    Grant, Miete & Robinson 0 between them

    Ugbo, 2, one every 138 minutes
    Etete 2, one every 93 minutes

    So despite the comments Etete is currently our most effective striker
    Hasn't Ugbo scored 3 already - Leeds, QPR and Wednesday?

  12. #37

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    I think a Moore type striker gets more from the likes of Meite, Ramsey and Grant.

  13. #38

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro de la Rosa View Post
    So he wasn't crap then
    Yes he was

    As the others like Robinson would have scored those goals.

    Andy Campbell scored in the play off final, doesn’t mean he was good.

  14. #39

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Moodybluebird View Post
    If we're in a strong league position come January I would definitely be looking to sign a decent striker. Look at the impact Frazer Campbell made when he joined us. Could make all the difference if we're pushing for a top 6 finish.
    Without a doubt.I think its very unlikely we will be pushing top 6 though.

  15. #40

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Moore would have buried those headers Meite, Ugbo and Grant have missed in the last two games.

  16. #41

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by PontBlue View Post
    Moore would have buried those headers Meite, Ugbo and Grant have missed in the last two games.
    He would also bring in the wider players better.

    Ugbo really struggles to retain the ball and when he does he does not lay off a sensible pass

  17. #42

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    If we’re in the mixer in January then it’s a no brainer we have to go for Moore. He could be the difference between play offs or not.

    If we’re not, no point.

  18. #43

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    not sure about a striker but this fellas name keeps popping up in various circles

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=Anasta...79218309f690c0

    might be nothing of course but thought it was worthy of a post

  19. #44

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    I think it's paying out money for something we don't need

  20. #45

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Moore would make a big difference. Ugbo does not lead the line like he would.

  21. #46

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Former Labour leader View Post
    Moore would make a big difference. Ugbo does not lead the line like he would.
    Moore is into his 30s. If we are comfortable in mid table lets build a young team that can take us forward over the next few years. If Grant continues to impress lets get him tied up on a permanent deal the same with Bowler.

    January window id be looking at players to improve us to eventually challenge for promotion.

    I think Kiefer would just be a short term fix.

    If he was cheap ie under a million then maybe.

  22. #47

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilts View Post
    Moore is into his 30s. If we are comfortable in mid table lets build a young team that can take us forward over the next few years. If Grant continues to impress lets get him tied up on a permanent deal the same with Bowler.

    January window id be looking at players to improve us to eventually challenge for promotion.

    I think Kiefer would just be a short term fix.

    If he was cheap ie under a million then maybe.
    It's more of a case of grant being in the last chance saloon isn't it ?

  23. #48

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
    It's more of a case of grant being in the last chance saloon isn't it ?
    Hes starting to look a real asset to us though. Theres obviously the risk of a downturn and hes playing for a contract.

    We cant pay loan fees so I think theres a fair chance the loanees we have theres a purchase agreement involved.

  24. #49

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    Quote Originally Posted by MOZZER2 View Post
    not sure about a striker but this fellas name keeps popping up in various circles

    https://www.bing.com/search?q=Anasta...79218309f690c0

    might be nothing of course but thought it was worthy of a post
    That's the first time I've visited Microsoft Bing. Sounds like he could be a useful player.

  25. #50
    First Team light up the darkness's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Ho Chi Minh City/Radyr
    Posts
    2,671

    Re: Do we really need to be paying out money for a striker ?

    This is player we need

    Incoming in January nqat

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •