+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Both those links are behind paywalls
It's owned by the Scott Trust - which also owns other print and digital media (including the Observer). It was loss making in the decade up to 2019 and reliant on group cross subsidies - but they claim that the individual donations/subscription they have been pushing have been successful and since 2019 the Guardian breaks even. As far as I understand it there is no rich individual or corporation behind the paper. It has moved to the right (firmly Blairite) in the last decade (a clear break from the stance when Alan Rusbridger was editor) but that doesn't appear to be at the direction of some shadowy funder in the background.
You've got to laugh. Vote Labour to get rid of the Tories... And you get the Tories 😂
I think Jon was teasing a little
https://geopolitics.co/2021/11/21/ho...-billionaires/
I couldn't care less if the labour party have to form a coalition with the liberals , independents and greens and whoever else
Get the Tories out
**** Starmer.
**** Starmer.
is it on your craigslist?
I’m surprised Starmer gets the hate he does
He keeps getting called Tory Lite, which is probably what this country needs
I'm with you here. I don't think socialism has failed. It's just been portrayed as a really dirty word. If socialism was such a bad thing, people forget that Corbyn's socialist leaning party clawed back a huge deficit in the polls and forced a hung parliament, which cost us £1b for Theresa May to bribe the DUP.
We've got one of the biggest economies in the world. The UK economy has grown, albeit stagnantly, since 2010 and is creating more billionnaires than ever before. Yet we keep being told there's no money available. We had austerity from 2010 and now there's a cost of living crisis. Those in low wage employment keep earning less and less when inflation is taken into consideration. Our doctors, nurses, teachers, police, firemen etc, were once among the most respected people in society, but they've had wage cuts in real terms for many years. We keep being told there's no money for public services. Councils are at breaking point; some have already been broken. People don't realise how dire things are for local authorities, instead many believe they just waste money all the time and don't provide any services.
In RCT there's discussions about parents having to pay for school transport. The council needs to save £85m. From where? The fat has already been cut off. It'll be services for the vunerable that are next hit. The NHS is in such a state across the UK that going private is the only option for many. If private healthcare becomes the norm, who will be most affected? The worst off.
If you believe the political right, the reason for all of these problems are the work shy and immigrants. How have we got to this position? Years ago, if you were down on your luck, others would help. Go back a bit in history and people wouldn't lock their homes. If your neighbour was stuck for something and you were out, they'd help themselves and repay asap. We had communities. We welcomed outsiders. Miners would pay a small percentage out of their wages to funds to help those who needed it. It built fantastic workmen's halls, libraries and other buildings. People appreciated that if you want things for the use of the general public, they needed to be paid for. Now we seem to have people who want to pay less tax but have better public services. It's one or the other.
I have a hunch. One of the reasons the M4 relief road wasn't built was due to the damage of a major nature reserve. I bet virtually everyone who would have happily demolished the Newport wetlands would be far less happy to do so if it was to build hotels to house immigrants.
And this is our society in 2023. Fuelled more by greed and personal interest than anything else. Wales in 1923 would have shuddered at the thought.
:) So nothing to do with Gordon Brown from 1997-2010 with his "light touch on the tiller" of financial regulations then ?. Nothing to do with PFI scheme's either that were kept off the books, when in reality meant hospitals cost three times the price to build.
Sounds like you have gone to Spec savers and bought a pair of rose tinted glasses.
No, not if it means that capitalism and deregulation is excluded - if you want to make Labour solely responsible for 2008, then you have to accept that the Tories are responsible for all of the cost of living crisis. The Tories can talk, with some justification, of other worldwide factors contributing to the cost of living crisis and it’s only right that Labour can say the same when it comes to 2008 although, in both cases, the Government of the day have to accept their share of responsibility for what happened.
Conservative austerity is required to cut the fat/waste from socialist over spending, which inevitably happens in the end under Labour. It's cyclical. Look at the 1970s then 00s
I do agree about communities being decimated with what i've seen described as "runaway individualism" and i see it as bad. the blame for that can be levelled at Thatcher's neo liberal economic reforms in the 1980s. How can this can be reversed?
I don't agree with your claim that people welcòmed outsiders more in the past. People have never welcomed outsiders, that's just not true. We are wired to protect and favour our own genetic interests (the in group). You can't have social cohesion and be welcoming to outsiders. Diversity undermines social cohesion and studies prove this.
The left get in a mess over this.
At the end of the last Labour government the Conservatives backed all of Labour's spending plans. If anything, there was disapproval that Labour weren't spending more after the banking crisis to stimulate the economy. Then they changed their tune and went with austerity.