https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...tical-violence
Tony Benn. I wish Labour had more like him. I'd still be a member.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...tical-violence
Tony Benn. I wish Labour had more like him. I'd still be a member.
This one, for example has had f*ck all interest. LOM WUM threads get more. I’m not being precious btw. It’s hilarious tbh.
I don't think anyone believes it tbh
From someone so interested in politics that's quite a shocking, disparaging, and dismissive comment.
The final paragraph from Andy Beckett reads:
"Yet as the Hester episode shows, violent sentiments can be expressed by people very close to power, seemingly without serious consequences for their political and commercial activities. Meanwhile, peaceful protesters are increasingly sent to prison. Where a country draws the line between acceptable and unacceptable politics is always very telling".
It's hard to disagree with that, isn't it? Considering Frank Hester said that Dianne Abbott "should be shot".
I suspect that hardly anyone has read the piece.
The Economic League
The Silent McCarthyism
Not all violence is physical
JamesWales should read about that
The establishment are against anything they see as a threat to their power, so instead of left v right you should view it as establishment v anti-establishment.
Surely you realise that many establishment institutions, parts of the media, universities etc are pretty consistent in promoting left-wing ideals though?
And equally, on this whole debate, surely you recognise that whatever measure you use of failure; murdering your citizens, economic mismanagement, starvation, denial of democracy or rights etc, that the left is no better than the right, and vice-versa. It really is a totally outdated way of viewing things really. It's become little more than window dressing and a term for a cultural outlook
‘Surely you realise’…. ‘Surely you recognise’…. Surely I don’t!
There is nothing outdated in realising and recognising that the wealth, power and privilege of the UK establishment has nothing to do with the political left which exists to challenge those things. A few sociology departments does not offset the vast and growing concentration of establishment power that exists to maintain that wealth, power and privilege. In my experience it is only the apologists for that inequality and abuse that argue the analysis is now irrelevant.
If you insist on widening the view to take in the crimes of parasitic bureaucratic castes in states that claim to be inspired by Marx and Lenin then all I can say is those regimes are not of the political left. The ‘left’ were among the first victims of those autocratic regimes. But that is a massive deflection anyway from the Andy Beckett article that started this thread which was clearly directed at the history and current threats of political violence directed at the left in the UK - that you claimed no one believes.
The terms still have meaning and value. You seem to think they are no more than archaic flags in someone’s culture wars. Gluey seems to see the world through a lens of pro-WEF and anti-WEF - who is in the Swiss bunker and who isn’t. I disagree with you both.
I mean you have literally selected two very specific and curious examples from the great history of political nations.
And one of them is wrong too. Scandinavian countries aren't socialist at all.
The issue of right, just, moral, good, honourable or successful governance of countries is nothing to do with the left/right scale at all. They will tend to be liberal democracies but that spans the spectrum in itself.