Quote Originally Posted by NinianKnight View Post
If the documentation proves that McKay was working for Nantes, then because of vicariously liability Nantes would be deemed as having arranged and paid for the flights even though they didn't do so directly or were even aware of the arrangements. They are ultimately responsible for their employee/agent/sub-contractors negligence.

It is the same as say a plumber working for a company who damages your bathroom. He personally wouldn't be liable to pay for the damage the plumbing company would.

The point would be who was McKay invoicing for arranging the flights? Nantes, Cardiff, Sala? Because I don't believe for one moment he was doing it out of the kindness of his heart.

Either he was doing it as part of the agents' service for which they would receive a massive fee, or Nantes and if it was Nantes bingo, give us the money!

As above even if the agents were paying for it from their fee they were still acting for Nantes so either way from the above thread if people are correct it seems positive.