Quote Originally Posted by Wales-Bales View Post
They don't actually do that, so no need for the misdirection. I shouldn't have to point out that purposly excluding a specific source of information is an entirely different topic.
Not different at all. Every source that they have excluded in the past has been done so deliberately and for a reason. Why should the Mail Online be an exception?

If you think the people should decide for themselves then you should surely agree that they should let anything and everything be a source.