Quote Originally Posted by Croesy Blue View Post
Also everything in that first paragraph is fact.

Former leader of the edl ✅
Convicted of fraud multiple times ✅
Convinced football hooligan ✅
Says himself he’s an advocate of free speech ✅

What do you have a problem with in there?

Can you debunk any of the actual facts in the article?
I'm not even sure if Tommy Robinson is who he says he his, he could very easily be playing a role, who knows for sure.