Here was my response the last time you tried that line of denial:Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Flynn and his new brief sought to argue that under the Brady obligations they were not provided with evidence as required that would exonerate him. The court classified the itemised things that Flynn's lawyer wanted into 6 types:
1.Information that Does Not Exist
2. Information the Government Does Not Possess
3. Information Mr. Flynn Concedes He Is Not Entitled to
4. Information that Has Already Been Provided
5. Information that Is Unrelated to the Charges Against Mr. Flynn or to His Sentencing
6. Remaining Requests
In each case the Judge found against Flynn and cast doubt on his lawyer's understanding of Brady and had some questions about her ethical behaviour.
It also concluded on your fabrication smears that "Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are “consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.
Even Flynn's lawyers have given up on that bull but you keep going if it makes you feel you have something to offer back beyond concern for my mental health!
Reply With Quote