Originally Posted by
JamesWales
No, it's the literal headline. And the United States has an entirely different history to us on this.
And I was pissed (off) on Saturday!
This is all massively regressive. Why are we endlessly saying that our skin colours is the most important thing?
What are his policies? Why not state the fact he has won and been elected? Why tie it to something he has no control over?
I'm glad he was elected. His skin colour is part of his history but has zero bearing over who governs our schools, hospitals, roads, economies etc