Slade Just Doesn't Get It

[insider]

Ole had 1 transfer window too many it was obvious he was useless as soon as he opened his mouth.
He just talked in football clichés and his team selection was based on the National lottery.
Slade has had to try and knock ole`s overpaid under worked "stars" into some sort of semblance of a football team. I`m giving him this transfer window to see what he can do.

[purple haze2]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

It's all guess work based on a biased one dimensional viewpoint.

[purple haze2]

He just does not get it.

I would imagine he does get it.

He's not going to openly criticise the management without first expecting to get sacked. And then possibly taken to the cleaners in the press.

Everyone after MM must be aware of this and, for me, this is why people will be weary of joining Cardiff.

He's just toeing the party line, so-to-speak.

"this is why people will be weary of joining Cardiff"

Spot on that's why we've ended up with a lower league journeyman manager that has never won a promotion in his career, who was one game away from getting the old tin tac from Orient

Do you think Pulis, Neil Lennon or any other prospective new manager would 'get it' and speak out against their owner within a few months of accepting the job in the same colours ?

[BlueWales]

Just for the record it's " wary " not " weary " you knumbskulls.

[Lawley Kazoo]

Just for the record it's " wary " not " weary " you knumbskulls.

You really have to get it right if you're going to slag some ones spelling.

[olderblue]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

If you have that's your call

[purple haze2]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

No, based on what I've seen I would question if you could trust him to bring in the type of players that are required

For various reasons, he might have a different attitude now.

[olderblue]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

No, based on what I've seen I would question if you could trust him to bring in the type of players that are required

Tan has previously shown that even CEO's don't last long under him (How many have we had 5-6 in the last 3-4 years)?

Do you think Slade is the right Manager for us?

[Jimmy Jimmy]

To be fair Blake talked a lot about it last week on radio Wales, and that its just not right there any more

[NECS]

Well that's all very interesting lads and lasses but unfortunately the truth is that the club is rotting from the head down with absolutely no end to it in sight.

[purple haze2]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

No, based on what I've seen I would question if you could trust him to bring in the type of players that are required

Tan has previously shown that even CEO's don't last long under him (How many have we had 5-6 in the last 3-4 years)?

I don't believe that the players have any respect for Slade as a manager, so unless he can get shot of them all and replace them in January, he's got no chance of having any success IMHO.

I have the humility to certainly know that I am not right all the time, but I would hope that everyone else on this board could admit the same about themselves.

[olderblue]

Well that's all very interesting lads and lasses but unfortunately the truth is that the club is rotting from the head down with absolutely no end to it in sight.

As much as it pains me to say it I have to agree

[olderblue]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

No, based on what I've seen I would question if you could trust him to bring in the type of players that are required

Tan has previously shown that even CEO's don't last long under him (How many have we had 5-6 in the last 3-4 years)?

I don't believe that the players have any respect for Slade as a manager, so unless he can get shot of them all and replace them in January, he's got no chance of having any success IMHO.

Lets put it another way, if this was your business would you run it in the way that it is currently being run, and I don't mean the cost cutting with players?

[purple haze2]

I don't think uncle Vinny has **** all to do with the club at present.

Although he may be heavily involved in asset stripping which Slade can do nothing about!

Success has many fathers, failures a B*stard

However back to the question, do you think Slade is a bad manager?

I'm not sure TBH. The team has been pretty poor under his tenure. However, every manager deserves atleast 1 transfer window to bring their own players in and implement their style of play. Agree?

No, based on what I've seen I would question if you could trust him to bring in the type of players that are required

Tan has previously shown that even CEO's don't last long under him (How many have we had 5-6 in the last 3-4 years)?

I don't believe that the players have any respect for Slade as a manager, so unless he can get shot of them all and replace them in January, he's got no chance of having any success IMHO.

He might

be a great guy and a very nice person, however just based on what I've seen if it was my hard earned he was spending he wouldn't get much of it that's for sure.

I've been both an employee and employer, so can see Tan's, Slade's and fans perspectives.

[lardy]

I certainly accept that fans must question matters like the rebrand, but to simply question and not try to understand the replies means that fans create monologue rather than dialogue.

What replies have we had?

[purple haze2]

I certainly accept that fans must question matters like the rebrand, but to simply question and not try to understand the replies means that fans create monologue rather than dialogue.

What replies have we had?

When people think poles apart, then the aim is to try to bring the thinking even just a little closer together.

[lardy]

I certainly accept that fans must question matters like the rebrand, but to simply question and not try to understand the replies means that fans create monologue rather than dialogue.

What replies have we had?

Tan has spoken many times.

But I can't remember any where he gave reasons for the rebrand, the reasons that you think the fans are supposed to try to understand. So if I've missed it, please give me the quote.

[EdinburghBlue]

Keep saying a winning run will bring the fans back. NOT THIS ONE.

Slades only been here a while. It's taken most of our fans 3 seasons to "get it"

[The Penguin]

With too many players at the club at present, there will likely be a number of players adversely affecting this 'layering'.

I expect Slade to bring 4/5 players in - we need them. If he is shipping the same number out then his 'big squad' statement is simply more fancy words surely.