Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson wrote on Sat, 10 January 2015 06:24
And there was me thinking that yesterday's news would mean an end to 32 months of people telling me what I should be doing regarding the rebrand (i.e. do exactly the same thing as the person issuing the instructions is).
Quote Originally Posted by Rock_Flock_of_Five wrote on Sat, 10 January 2015 06:03
Right from day one this has been a personal issue for everyone involved and so much of the ill feeling and arguments might have been avoided if that had been appreciated more.
Quote Originally Posted by the other bob wilson wrote on Sat, 10 January 2015 04:29
It took some of us longer to get there than it did others, but eventually there were enough individuals making, or threatening to make, decisions which would have made life very difficult for those running the club. Eventually that penny dropped with the man who really counted in this affair and, fair play to him, he was big enough to admit the error of his ways - that might not be how the story is being spun by the club, but it seems to me that this is exactly what has happened.
I think the reasons he gave for returning to blue were as cringeworthy as Tucks's Sermon. But perhaps I'm being cynical. Still - if he looks after the club well and listens to us, then by all means build bridges IMV.