So Radovan Karadzic has got 40 years for genocide, including the murder of 8000 men and boys. Is Adam Johnson's crime really deserving of 6 years on that basis? Seems a bit steep to me.
This guy got 12 years for multiple rapes of little girls:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-west-35649988
Surely his crimes were more than twice as bad as Johnson's?