GLAMMY

[Llanedeyrnblue]

I thought the match was lost more in the first half of the Glamorgan innings. I know the game has changed in the last few years and almost anything can be possible in the last twenty overs now if you've wickets in hand, but, on what was obviously a very good pitch, taking up nearly half of your overs to get to a hundred, especially when you're not losing wickets, seems to be a bit too slow to me. Given how the match panned out, I think Glamorgan would have won if you had been able to post that they were 101 - 0 in the twentieth, rather than twenty third, over.

Yes you're right there,we have talked about Rudolf's slowness in previous games,he puts extra pressure on the other batsmen.Last night he hit 44 off 65 balls,a strike rate of 67 that's just not good enough