There is a thread on ****:
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/vi...p?f=2&t=180242
Similar range of views as on here. Mainly 'lay off Malky', 'screw the thieving agents', 'the timing must be co-incidental'.
+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
There is a thread on ****:
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/vi...p?f=2&t=180242
Similar range of views as on here. Mainly 'lay off Malky', 'screw the thieving agents', 'the timing must be co-incidental'.
It is the newspaper that is running the story now. The case has been running for a while.
They have launched a claim to have it heard in open court....not launched a claim
I might have used it wrongly?, but I did mean incredulous - as in 'incredulous to me'.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous
TBH, an incorrect (or not) word is the least of my own woes in this thread, having a: taken the Daily Mail seriously and b: got slightly jerky of knee over it ;) deary me, what was I (not) thinking!
I cant believe some people actually think Tan has now got this in court as Malkys got a job.
As much as i like and admire Malky, if he has committed a crime then Vincent Tann has every right to take him to court. As far as agents goes, i really do think that they are vultures and that all clubs in the UK should stop paying their outlandish fees.
The thread on there is quite refreshing.
The only people defending Malky are ***** and the grange end multi whose defence seems to consist of Barry Shitpeas and City123's posts copied from here.
As soon as ***** starts using facebook quotes to back himself up you know he is swimming against the tide.
My opinion is get this into public court and if guilty fuk em all, Tan may have done the football world a service.
I'd say the timing here is a coincidence, but the idea that the Daily Mail was tipped off by someone at the club about the hearing today after the news broke about Malky's proposed job seems plausible to me.
The obvious "dodgy" looking transfer from that summer was the Cornelius one (or so it seems to me at least), so it's a surprise to see that the charges stem from a couple of deals where we paid what I'd say was the going rate for the two players involved - reportedly, we also got our money back when Caulker signed for QPR and the Jones/Odemwingie swap was generally thought to be a fair one, in financial terms at least, at the time.
If you mess with Tan look out.I was told from day one that he is a man of honour and principles.If you cross him thats it you will regret it and I dont blame him.He made one big mistake by changing our colour and put that right along with saving the club but some only a small number will not forgive.On the other hand you can be a football hooligan drag the name of our club through the dirt be forgiven and welcomed back its a strange old world we live in.
From reading for about 2 minutes you understand why tan is going for this.
It isn't a vendetta against MM.