She - just like us is entitled to do whatever she wants as long as it is within the law. Well that's one side of the argument.
The other side being she and her mate 'the pimlico plumber' are obviously doing this for the express reason of slowing down the already slow process and trying to get it all bogged down in red tape.
What is there to stop the Govt from passing a law to say that they will have the final say and not the supreme court etc.
It's all political gesturing and whether you approve or not is down to your stand point I guess.
It could however be a whole lot worse, Prime Minister Corbyn idea of Brexit would be
The Brexit vote meant leave the EU, with the ability to create UK laws which could not be usurped by any EU institution and as such striek trade deals, claim back fishing rights etc etc etc and everything else - so anything or anybody within the EU which stops that - we should not be part of.
Like it or not that was what was voted for - and the UK needs to ensure that happens.
Personally - the whole question should never have been asked - and it was an impossible answer (internal EU reform was needed, free movement of people pre Maastright etc as an example ), but the result happened, anything else and we may not be as democratic as we tell others to be.
UK growth forecast to go from 2.2 to 1.4% , Germany forecast to go from 1.4% growth to 1.0% in 2017. Uncertain times ahead for all it seems. I guess no one saw the ex Australian commissioner interview about what happened the week after Brexit - it seems there is a queue forming. Very interesting times ahead full of opportunity, maybe upsetting the apple cart was needed for reform all round