+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
I've heard the term 'fake news' bandied about this week more times then I can remember.
What did we do before it ??
Talking about being in bed with Brietbart, Infowars and Alex Jones, I just came across a copy of the rumoured video where a slightly inebriated Jones claims he is being sued by John Podesta. The original video was subsequently deleted very quickly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy8cOuFETbs
What's wrong with sponsoring black lives matter? Yes some protests got out of hand and like all big groups it has its extreme idiots but it's still a needed group in the US.
I'm not sure what I would label it, humanitarian maybe.
Yep, Breitbart are evil
Louise Mensch:
"that's tomorrow's story.
Russia planted the emails from Clinton on Weiner's computer
Breitbart staffers were almost certainly involved"
https://twitter.com/LouiseMensch/sta...61916541743105
I am not sure how anyone can be happy at this.
And I am not completely a fan of the big boys in media.
Fascinating and shocking - even if quarter accurate.
Yes, I know it's The Guardian, and not some utterly trustworthy source. .. Such as.... ;)
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...e_iOSApp_Other
Last edited by Vimana.; 27-02-17 at 09:56. Reason: oops - fixed the link
Don't think you're bothered who it is
http://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php...=1#post4719153
The Guardian was a publication that I used to read before the Brexit fiasco. I now consider them to be the yin to the yang of the right leaning globalist media. They are one and the same, with the only thing separating them being a thinly disguised attempt at seeming to be ideologically opposite.
The Guardian journo's account of events seems to amount to the same tale - from the other side of the coin, using different players.
There is a common denominator though - that we are being harvested, hoodwinked, misled and herded.
By whom - for whom? is the fundamental element that needs clarification.
Every claim you make seems to be the complete reverse of the actual facts. I don't know how you can get things so wrong. The editor of the UK edition of Breitbart is not a white man. Who is he racist against? Breitbart's articles are usually about problems caused by Islamic religious bigotry and sexism. How does that make Breitbart "pro sexist and bigotry"? Even your defenders on here like Vimana must be wondering if you have a screw loose.