| + Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Why is she getting roasted on Twitter?
I caught some of her remarks about encryption this morning. I imagine she wants more snooping powers on the back of what happened in London some days back, and that some people who pay attention to and are concerned about the never ending incremental changes to liberties are getting their hair off. From everything I've seen of her she strikes me as very lightweight for a Home Secretary.
No amount of spying will stop someone driving cars in to people.Originally Posted by Organ Morgan.
So what do suggest she does, or what we do ,because this is not good and people are dying.
I have no idea, I just know that people who are determined to kill people will find a way.
This is more regarding what she's on about: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politic...pdown-10105142
I Like this bit:
And Lib Dem Home Affairs Spokesman Brian Paddick said what Ms Rudd is proposing was “draconian”. He said: “These terrorists want to destroy our freedoms and undermine our democratic society.
“By implementing draconian laws that limit our civil liberties, we would be playing into their hands."
It's not just terrorists who want to destroy our freedoms; it's those governments who create, fund and arm ISIS and the like - and Russia isn't amongst those governments.
Surely you just need the necessary hashtags to stop them in their tracks.
I propose the immediate banning of all motor vehicles, kitchen utensils and mobile phones.
Something like that
How can people with such little idea of what they're talking about be the ones who make the decisions? It's terrifying.
Absolutely! It also means that she is incapable of following the simple script that was given to her before she made her round of media appearances.
Last edited by Wales-Bales; 27-03-17 at 10:46.
Most definitely.
You hear some politicians and they are just so uninspiring. I meet people in my day to day life that are far more impressive.
She comes across as a bang average politician that you'd find in a safe seat.
Theresa probably hired her because she will wilt any do anything she says. She can mold her after doing the role. Not that that will be much different to any of her other cronies.
Last edited by LordKenwyne; 27-03-17 at 14:30.
"No sooner had May proclaimed a commitment to the spirit of freedom than her officials were hinting at increased state control of the internet and new forms of spying on citizens’ conversations. After last week’s attack we should reclaim freedom from those who seek to erode it – and that includes May’s government"
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite...2#.WNkJnvkrJPY
She's called Amber because she's piss poor.
It would if such plans were rumbled, of course.
Who are you going to message if you are a lone nutter?
Your comment was more sweeping than that.
Ok then, would you plan a terrorist attack online if you knew something you said might get picked up? no, you would go and sit in a field away from any technology and plan it wouldn't you? I would if I were a terrorist.
Surely it's easier to end the car hire business? There would have been no need to rumble anything then.
I will ignore your constantly changing the goalposts but the fact that many plots have been reported as foiled belies your initial comment - and evidence collected may be far more nebulous that simply reading a message referring to a plan.Ok then, would you plan a terrorist attack online if you knew something you said might get picked up? no, you would go and sit in a field away from any technology and plan it wouldn't you? I would if I were a terrorist.
Of course. No right-thinking terrorist would use his own car.
I haven't changed any goalposts
How do we know how many plots they have foiled really?
I responded to your comment "No amount of spying will stop someone driving cars in to people" but never mind.I haven't changed any goalposts
How do we know how many plots they have foiled really?
Are you Feedback in disguise?
you said "It would if such plans were rumbled, of course." then I said who is a lone attacker going to make plans with? how is that not addressing your answer?
I will take the "Feedback in disguise" bit as a complement
:rolleyes:you said "It would if such plans were rumbled, of course." then I said who is a lone attacker going to make plans with? how is that not addressing your answer?
I will take the "Feedback in disguise" bit as a complement
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote